File talk:Shunting yard.svg: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
This pic sucks and should be used and example of how not to illustrated an algorithm. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/74.108.56.239|74.108.56.239]] ([[User talk:74.108.56.239|talk]]) 01:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/74.108.56.239|74.108.56.239]] ([[User talk:74.108.56.239|talk]]) 01:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
The above is a bit harsh but I agree it's unnecessarily ambigious. It would be clearer if the original expression were "A + B * C - D". [[Special:Contributions/208.97.218.10|208.97.218.10]] ([[User talk:208.97.218.10|talk]]) 14:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:38, 25 September 2013
This example sucks. I don't think I could construct a more frustrating and ambiguous example. The ONE part of the algorithm that has any subtlety (step g) is completely masked by this illustration. Which + ends up on the stack? Which one's on the left?
Why in the world would you put two +s in there? Why? It's like you're intentionally making people misunderstand the algorithm. My god.
74.108.56.239 (talk) 01:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
The above is a bit harsh but I agree it's unnecessarily ambigious. It would be clearer if the original expression were "A + B * C - D". 208.97.218.10 (talk) 14:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)