User:Thane/Question for Alibabs: Difference between revisions
m WilliamH moved page User:Guðsþegn/Question for Alibabs to User:Thane/Question for Alibabs: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Guðsþegn" to "Thane" |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| style="font-size: {{{info-s|8}}}pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: {{{info-fc|black}}};" | This user is a [[Catholic Evangelical|catholic and evangelical]] '''[[Christianity|Christian]]'''. |
| style="font-size: {{{info-s|8}}}pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: {{{info-fc|black}}};" | This user is a [[Catholic Evangelical|catholic and evangelical]] '''[[Christianity|Christian]]'''. |
||
|}</div><br style="clear:left" /> |
|}</div><br style="clear:left" /> |
||
'''HOW MANY TIMES do I have to say ''keep'', ''undelete'', whatever?''' - The Catholic Evangelical userbox (one I created) '''was still under [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Userbox_debates/Archive#Template:User_Catholic_Evangelical|another deletion review]]''' after having been deleted by [[User:Improv]] on 2006-02-20. The conclusion of '''that DRV has now been held pending [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_February_28#Template:User_Catholic_Evangelical|the new TFD you caused]]'''. This vote should have never been started because of the DRV that was still in progress. Uuggh. This template survived the January 5th mass '''TFD''' (185-28), it would have survived the February 20th '''DRV''' (17-9; but you deleted it mid-process), now it's up for another pointless '''TFD'''. The current count is overwhelming ''Keep'' (14-4). Why did you do the TFD without checking for an ongoing DRV? Apparently, it had just been reverted to existence after surviving five days of voting, but the DRV was never closed, and voting continued. By the time [[User:Grue]] closed the voting, you already had this new TFD going, so he could not render a judgement. You could fix this fiasco. < |
'''HOW MANY TIMES do I have to say ''keep'', ''undelete'', whatever?''' - The Catholic Evangelical userbox (one I created) '''was still under [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Userbox_debates/Archive#Template:User_Catholic_Evangelical|another deletion review]]''' after having been deleted by [[User:Improv]] on 2006-02-20. The conclusion of '''that DRV has now been held pending [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_February_28#Template:User_Catholic_Evangelical|the new TFD you caused]]'''. This vote should have never been started because of the DRV that was still in progress. Uuggh. This template survived the January 5th mass '''TFD''' (185-28), it would have survived the February 20th '''DRV''' (17-9; but you deleted it mid-process), now it's up for another pointless '''TFD'''. The current count is overwhelming ''Keep'' (14-4). Why did you do the TFD without checking for an ongoing DRV? Apparently, it had just been reverted to existence after surviving five days of voting, but the DRV was never closed, and voting continued. By the time [[User:Grue]] closed the voting, you already had this new TFD going, so he could not render a judgement. You could fix this fiasco. <span style="background: lightblue; color:#000000;"> '''GUÐSÞEGN''' </span> – <small>[[User:Guðsþegn|U]][[User talk:Guðsþegn|T]][[Special:Emailuser/Guðsþegn|E]][[WP:X|X]]</small> – 21:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 19:03, 28 February 2023
Originally posted at: User talk:Alibabs
|
This user is a catholic and evangelical Christian. |
HOW MANY TIMES do I have to say keep, undelete, whatever? - The Catholic Evangelical userbox (one I created) was still under another deletion review after having been deleted by User:Improv on 2006-02-20. The conclusion of that DRV has now been held pending the new TFD you caused. This vote should have never been started because of the DRV that was still in progress. Uuggh. This template survived the January 5th mass TFD (185-28), it would have survived the February 20th DRV (17-9; but you deleted it mid-process), now it's up for another pointless TFD. The current count is overwhelming Keep (14-4). Why did you do the TFD without checking for an ongoing DRV? Apparently, it had just been reverted to existence after surviving five days of voting, but the DRV was never closed, and voting continued. By the time User:Grue closed the voting, you already had this new TFD going, so he could not render a judgement. You could fix this fiasco. GUÐSÞEGN – UTEX – 21:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC)