User talk:Mwng: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m wader |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Thanks, Jim |
:Thanks, Jim |
||
==[[wader]]== |
|||
Hi, I'm a bit concerned that you seem to be systematically deleting the important link to [[wader]], the relevant subfamily of birds for eg [[Turnstone]], but sparing the American equivalent [[shorebird]], which is a redirect to wader. Is there any reason for this, or did you just not appreciate that wader is a taxonomic group? [[User:Jimfbleak|jimfbleak]] 06:48, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:48, 31 August 2004
Hello Mwng and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
Thomas Bainbrigge Fletcher
Thanks for the additions and cleanup to this and the Harold Maxwell-Lefroy. Shyamal 12:14, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Great Tit
I've noted your many helpful edits to bird articles, but there is one minor point I wanted to discuss. Great Tit has two alternative generic names, Parus and Periparus. My preference would be to have just one of these in the taxobox, to make it less cluttered, and comment on the alternative in the text.
I don't much mind which goes in the taxobox, although generally we follow Handbook of Birds of the World, which uses the newer Periparus.
Another example where we have adopted a similar approach is Great Egret, which is allocated to no less than three genera. Thanks, Jim
- Thanks, Jim
Hi, I'm a bit concerned that you seem to be systematically deleting the important link to wader, the relevant subfamily of birds for eg Turnstone, but sparing the American equivalent shorebird, which is a redirect to wader. Is there any reason for this, or did you just not appreciate that wader is a taxonomic group? jimfbleak 06:48, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)