Talk:Nuestra Señora de la Concepción: Difference between revisions
updated assessment for b-class criterium b5 |
m Talk page general fixes & other cleanup using AWB (9486) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Spain}} |
{{WikiProject Spain}} |
||
{{WikiProject Ships|class=start|B1=n|B2=n|B3=y|B4=y|B5=n|needs-infobox=y}} |
{{WikiProject Ships|class=start|B1=n|B2=n|B3=y|B4=y|B5=n|needs-infobox=y}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Military history|class=start|B1=n|B2=n|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Maritime=y|Spanish=y|Early-Modern=y}} |
||
}} |
|||
== Spitfire == |
== Spitfire == |
||
I have put this explanation separately from [[Spitfire]] and [[HMS_Spitfire]] because the [[euphemism]] needs explaining, but even now some people object to unexpectedly coming actoss the word "shit". [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] 05:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC) |
I have put this explanation separately from [[Spitfire]] and [[HMS_Spitfire]] because the [[euphemism]] needs explaining, but even now some people object to unexpectedly coming actoss the word "shit". [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] 05:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:31, 22 September 2013
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nuestra Señora de la Concepción article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Spitfire
I have put this explanation separately from Spitfire and HMS_Spitfire because the euphemism needs explaining, but even now some people object to unexpectedly coming actoss the word "shit". Anthony Appleyard 05:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- I'm just confused as to what this has to do with 'Spitfire?' 75.75.110.235 15:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Revert the page move?
I do not think that the present title is very apt. I believe, it should be reverted back to Cacafuego. Or, perhaps, Cagafuego, for that matter. Any objections? --Dart evader 16:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
As no one objected, I've moved it back to 'Cacafuego'. Dart evader 06:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
More importantly than the title; this page has no sources cited. Network57 05:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
O'Brian Reference
Cacafuego was a rather common name for Spanish ships, and was applied to dozens of various vessels. Given this, the Master and Commander reference in this article seems extraordinarily tenuous. Fell Gleamingtalk 11:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Disposition of its Treasure
The second paragraph of this section twice refers to the Cacafuego. This should be changed to Cagafuego. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oregontsunami (talk • contribs) 21:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed Spain articles
- Unknown-importance Spain articles
- All WikiProject Spain pages
- Start-Class Ships articles
- Ship articles without infoboxes
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class Spanish military history articles
- Spanish military history task force articles
- Start-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles