Talk:Hakan Fidan: Difference between revisions
Bot: New page. |
Prosfilaes (talk | contribs) →NATO: new section |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=stub|auto=yes}} |
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=stub|auto=yes}} |
||
== NATO == |
|||
I removed the claim that this was a NATO thing; the cite, [http://www.globalresearch.ca/natos-plans-for-false-flag-attack-on-turkey/5375646?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=natos-plans-for-false-flag-attack-on-turkey] starts off by saying "It has been revealed that NATO has been planning a false flag attack against Turkey to justify the Turkish invasion of northern Syria, the International Business Times reported in its article, “Turkey YouTube Ban: Full Transcript of Leaked Syria ‘War’ Conversation Between Erdogan Officials.”", except that the IBT article linked, [http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/turkey-youtube-ban-full-transcript-leaked-syria-war-conversation-between-erdogan-officials-1442161], says nothing about NATO. They're also partnered with Stop NATO, which makes them a very non-neutral source, and have a disclaimer at the bottom, "Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article.", making this an unedited source.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 22:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:06, 21 September 2014
Biography Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
NATO
I removed the claim that this was a NATO thing; the cite, [1] starts off by saying "It has been revealed that NATO has been planning a false flag attack against Turkey to justify the Turkish invasion of northern Syria, the International Business Times reported in its article, “Turkey YouTube Ban: Full Transcript of Leaked Syria ‘War’ Conversation Between Erdogan Officials.”", except that the IBT article linked, [2], says nothing about NATO. They're also partnered with Stop NATO, which makes them a very non-neutral source, and have a disclaimer at the bottom, "Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article.", making this an unedited source.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)