Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Nations Seeker: Difference between revisions
BryanStrome (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m Signing comment by BryanStrome - "" |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 21:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 21:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
As webmaster of First Nation Seeker, I wish to say I DID NOT originate this new Wikipedia page about First Nations Seeker. But now that I am aware of it, it is painful to go through this death row experience. I think the reason that it hasn't been written about is that it so novel that it doesn't process in peoples' brains. Certainly, I am light years ahead of the average Native American who tend to focus on their local areas... Meanwhile on January 1, 2013, Google clobbered First Nations Seeker with a "banishment" penalty. Reasons unknown. No SEO going on here. Recently though, Google has relisted it, albeit, far down in the results such that the site only gets about 20 visitors per day. In effect, they've done their very best to ensure that the site is ineffective. That hasn't stopped such organizations as Yale University Library or the Library of Congress from linking to it though... [[User:Bryan Strome|Bryan Strome]] ([[User talk:Bryan Strome|talk]]) 10:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC) |
As webmaster of First Nation Seeker, I wish to say I DID NOT originate this new Wikipedia page about First Nations Seeker. But now that I am aware of it, it is painful to go through this death row experience. I think the reason that it hasn't been written about is that it so novel that it doesn't process in peoples' brains. Certainly, I am light years ahead of the average Native American who tend to focus on their local areas... Meanwhile on January 1, 2013, Google clobbered First Nations Seeker with a "banishment" penalty. Reasons unknown. No SEO going on here. Recently though, Google has relisted it, albeit, far down in the results such that the site only gets about 20 visitors per day. In effect, they've done their very best to ensure that the site is ineffective. That hasn't stopped such organizations as Yale University Library or the Library of Congress from linking to it though... [[User:Bryan Strome|Bryan Strome]] ([[User talk:Bryan Strome|talk]]) 10:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:BryanStrome|BryanStrome]] ([[User talk:BryanStrome|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/BryanStrome|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 17:58, 31 July 2013
- First Nations Seeker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedily deleted once for lack of notability. Author now claims "I believe I have made the necessary edits to have the page remain". I disagree. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:14, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Interesting website, but it does not meet WP:NWEB. --bonadea contributions talk 18:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
This entry has cultural and political significance to North American First Nations groups. I have contacted the organizer of the First Nations Seeker to request more 3rd party references, preferably peer-reviewed journal articles ggatin (talk) 21:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
As webmaster of First Nation Seeker, I wish to say I DID NOT originate this new Wikipedia page about First Nations Seeker. But now that I am aware of it, it is painful to go through this death row experience. I think the reason that it hasn't been written about is that it so novel that it doesn't process in peoples' brains. Certainly, I am light years ahead of the average Native American who tend to focus on their local areas... Meanwhile on January 1, 2013, Google clobbered First Nations Seeker with a "banishment" penalty. Reasons unknown. No SEO going on here. Recently though, Google has relisted it, albeit, far down in the results such that the site only gets about 20 visitors per day. In effect, they've done their very best to ensure that the site is ineffective. That hasn't stopped such organizations as Yale University Library or the Library of Congress from linking to it though... Bryan Strome (talk) 10:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BryanStrome (talk • contribs)