Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memebot: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*maybe put an entry in wiktionary, then link all existing references to the wiktionary article for clarifcation. otherwise how are all the new members of alt.satanism going to get up to speed? it is a *regularly used term in memetics*. or we should just ditch wikipedia entries on 'meme' and 'memetics' itself (i agree, neologism argument invalid) |
*maybe put an entry in wiktionary, then link all existing references to the wiktionary article for clarifcation. otherwise how are all the new members of alt.satanism going to get up to speed? it is a *regularly used term in memetics*. or we should just ditch wikipedia entries on 'meme' and 'memetics' itself (i agree, neologism argument invalid) |
||
*"Keep it"I found it valuable to have this entry here and linked through memetic engineering. |
|||
Revision as of 03:00, 12 June 2006
dicdef, neologism, nn. Delete. KleenupKrew 22:34, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NEO. Stifle (talk) 21:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Dumb, dumb idea! MEME itself is a neologism. To delete this article on the basis of neologism policy is just obscenely stupid. I'm certain secondary sources could be found that mention the word Memebot. It's a widespread memetical concept.
-Ormuz Bey
- maybe put an entry in wiktionary, then link all existing references to the wiktionary article for clarifcation. otherwise how are all the new members of alt.satanism going to get up to speed? it is a *regularly used term in memetics*. or we should just ditch wikipedia entries on 'meme' and 'memetics' itself (i agree, neologism argument invalid)
- "Keep it"I found it valuable to have this entry here and linked through memetic engineering.