Jump to content

User:Animum/RfA criteria: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
+cat
more specific cat.
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{essay|cat=Category:User criteria for adminship}}
{{essay}}
'''I have no RfA criteria.''' Judging candidates on a case-by-case basis seems to me to be more logical than forcing a set of standards on each user applying for the post.
'''I have no RfA criteria.''' Judging candidates on a case-by-case basis seems to me to be more logical than forcing a set of standards on each user applying for the post.


I will support any candidate unless I have a good reason not to; therefore, you will probably see me at least once saying, "'''Support''' — I have read the opposes and find them unpersuasive." Of course, I recognize that reading over others' opposes is no substitute for reviewing a user's contributions myself, but in all honesty my laziness often gets the better of me.
I will support any candidate unless I have a good reason not to; therefore, you will probably see me at least once saying, "'''Support''' — I have read the opposes and find them unpersuasive." Of course, I recognize that reading over others' opposes is no substitute for reviewing a user's contributions myself, but in all honesty my laziness often gets the better of me.
[[Category:User essays about adminship]]

Latest revision as of 23:54, 28 December 2017

I have no RfA criteria. Judging candidates on a case-by-case basis seems to me to be more logical than forcing a set of standards on each user applying for the post.

I will support any candidate unless I have a good reason not to; therefore, you will probably see me at least once saying, "Support — I have read the opposes and find them unpersuasive." Of course, I recognize that reading over others' opposes is no substitute for reviewing a user's contributions myself, but in all honesty my laziness often gets the better of me.