Jump to content

Marxist aesthetics: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ninjabeard (talk | contribs)
m Bibliography: added books by Benjamin and Tedman to bibliography
Ninjabeard (talk | contribs)
Line 25: Line 25:
==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==
*[http://www.poetrymagic.co.uk/literary-theory/marxist-views.html PoetryMagic: Literary Theory: Marxist Views]
*[http://www.poetrymagic.co.uk/literary-theory/marxist-views.html PoetryMagic: Literary Theory: Marxist Views]
*''Understanding Brecht'', [[Walter Benjamin]], Verso Books, 2003)ISBN-10: 1859844189, ISBN-13: 978-1859844182.
*''Understanding Brecht'', [[Walter Benjamin]], Verso Books, 2003, ISBN-10: 1859844189, ISBN-13: 978-1859844182.
* ''Aesthetics and Politics: Debates Between Bloch, Lukacs, Brecht, Benjamin, Adorno''. 1980. Trans. ed. Ronald Taylor. London: Verso. ISBN 0-86091-722-3.
* ''Aesthetics and Politics: Debates Between Bloch, Lukacs, Brecht, Benjamin, Adorno''. 1980. Trans. ed. Ronald Taylor. London: Verso. ISBN 0-86091-722-3.
* [[Theodor W. Adorno|Adorno, Theodor W.]] 2004. ''Aesthetic Theory''. London: Continuum. ISBN 0-8264-7691-0.
* [[Theodor W. Adorno|Adorno, Theodor W.]] 2004. ''Aesthetic Theory''. London: Continuum. ISBN 0-8264-7691-0.

Revision as of 19:50, 4 January 2014

Marxist aesthetics is a theory of aesthetics based on, or derived from, the theories of Karl Marx. It involves a dialectical and materialist, or dialectical materialist, approach to the application of Marxism to the cultural sphere, specifically areas related to taste such as art, beauty, etc. Marxists believe that economic and social conditions, and especially the class relations that derive from them, affect every aspect of an individual's life, from religious beliefs to legal systems to cultural frameworks. From one classic Marxist point of view, the role of art is not only to represent such conditions truthfully, but also to seek to improve them (social/socialist realism), however, this is a contentious interpretation of the limited but significant writing by Marx and Engels on art and especially on aesthetics. For instance Nikolay Chernyshevsky, who greatly influenced the art of the early Soviet Union, was not following Marx's statements on the subject so much as the humanist Ludwig Feuerbach.

Marxist aesthetics overlaps and bleeds into the Marxist theory of art and there is no clear separation of the two, although there is an obvious distinction in that aesthetics represents a tackling of the more fundamental and philosophical questions. It is also very concerned with art practice, and so with defining a prescription of what art should be like and what it should do socially rather than only act as an interpretation of it.

The aim of science is also important to a Marxist aesthetics, although it may not appear to be an obvious target for all theorists, the materialist economic and social foundations of the subject imply that this is necessary in order to be properly Marxian in the sense of scientific socialism.

Some notable Marxist aestheticians include Georgi Plekhanov, Aleksei Gan, William Morris, Theodor W. Adorno, Bertolt Brecht, Herbert Marcuse, Walter Benjamin, Antonio Gramsci, Georg Lukács, Terry Eagleton, Fredric Jameson and Raymond Williams.

Not all of these figures are solely concerned with aesthetics - in many cases Marxist aesthetics forms only an important sub section of their work, depending on how you define the term; for example, Brecht may be said to have a Marxist aesthetic that is revealed through his artistic work, but his aesthetic theory is something distinct and appears as theory by him about his own artistic production, about art in general, and on questions of taste and its role in society.

One of the chief concerns of Marxist aesthetics is to unite Marx and Engels’ social and economic theory, or theory of the social base, to the domain of art and culture, the superstructure, seamlessly (base and superstructure of society being an important Marxist concept since at least Marx's The German Ideology). In this respect Marx’s early Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 have always been seen to be important, given the themes of sensuousness and alienation. Its late publication (because of the decision to cancel publication in 1846, the text first appeared only in 1932, an English translation only became available in 1959[1]) meant, however, that it was not available to art theorists during, for instance, the antagonistic debates on art in the early Soviet Union between the constructivist avant garde and socialist realism.

Many theorists touch upon important themes of Marxist aesthetics without strictly being Marxist aestheticians, Joel Kovel, for instance, has extended the concepts of Marxian ecology which deeply implicates aesthetics. He is also a part of the struggle to bridge the space between Marx and Freud, which has Marxist aesthetics as a central concern (see the journal Capitalism, Nature, Socialism). Current themes within the field include research on the affect of mass produced industrial materials on the sensed environment, such as paints and colors.[2]

Visual artists, as diverse as Isaak Brodsky or Diego Rivera and Kasimir Malevich or Lyubov Popova, for example, for whom written theory is secondary, nevertheless may be said to be connected to Marxist aesthetics through their production of art, without necessarily declaring themselves aestheticians or Marxists in writing. Such a view could apply to many visual and other artists, even those who have no apparent voiced connection to Marxist politics or even those opposed.

The field remains polemical, with camps of modernists, post modernists, anti modernists, the avant garde, constructivists, social realists and socialist realists all referencing back to an ostensible Marxist aesthetic theory that would underpin their art practices by grounding an art theory.

See also

References

  1. ^ Tedman, Gary. (2004) "Marx's 1844 manuscripts as a work of art: A hypertextual reinterpretation." Rethinking Marxism 16.4: 427-441.
  2. ^ Singh, Iona. (2007) "Color, Facture, Art and Design." Capitalism Nature Socialism 18.1: 64-80.

Bibliography

  • PoetryMagic: Literary Theory: Marxist Views
  • Understanding Brecht, Walter Benjamin, Verso Books, 2003, ISBN-10: 1859844189, ISBN-13: 978-1859844182.
  • Aesthetics and Politics: Debates Between Bloch, Lukacs, Brecht, Benjamin, Adorno. 1980. Trans. ed. Ronald Taylor. London: Verso. ISBN 0-86091-722-3.
  • Adorno, Theodor W. 2004. Aesthetic Theory. London: Continuum. ISBN 0-8264-7691-0.
  • Brecht, Bertolt. 1964. Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. Ed. and trans. John Willett. British edition. London: Methuen. ISBN 0-413-38800-X. USA edition. New York: Hill and Wang. ISBN 0-8090-3100-0.
  • ---. 2000a. Brecht on Film and Radio. Ed. and trans. Marc Silberman. British edition. London: Methuen. ISBN 0-413-72500-6.
  • ---. 2003a. Brecht on Art and Politics. Ed. and trans. Thomas Kuhn and Steve Giles. British edition. London: Methuen. ISBN 0-413-75890-7.
  • Eagleton, Terry. 1990. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-16302-6.
  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1978. The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics. Trans. Herbert Marcuse and Erica Sherover. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Marx, Karl and Frederick Engels. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels on Literature and Art, ISBN 1-905510-02-0
  • Macdonald Daly, A Primer in Marxist Aesthetics, Zoilus Press, 1999. ISBN 978-0-9522028-1-3
  • Aesthetics & Alienation, Gary Tedman, Zero Books, 2012. ISBN-10: 1780993013, ISBN-13: 978-1780993010.