Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin E. Osgood Award: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 19:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 19:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
*I disagree this award is relevant for Wiki documentation. '''[[User:Wilkistudent| Wilkistudent]]''' ([[User talk:Wilkistudent| talk ]]) 02:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)<br />

*This award is relevant for Wikipedia documentation. Its a prestigious award worthy of encyclopedic significance. '''[[User:AFMRwesternsection| AFMRwesternsection]]''' ([[User talk:AFMRwesternsection| talk ]]) 09:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)<br />

Revision as of 07:56, 6 January 2014

Edwin E. Osgood Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Regional award, not of encyclopedic significance. DGG ( talk ) 02:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree this award is relevant for Wiki documentation. Wilkistudent ( talk ) 02:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This award is relevant for Wikipedia documentation. Its a prestigious award worthy of encyclopedic significance. AFMRwesternsection ( talk ) 09:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Ross HillTalk to me! 03:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 19:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]