Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin E. Osgood Award: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:58, 14 January 2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No compelling, policy-backed arguments have been made for the inclusion of this article. Therefore, this article's subject is found to not have the required notability at this time. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 18:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin E. Osgood Award

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Regional award, not of encyclopedic significance. DGG ( talk ) 02:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree this award is relevant for Wiki documentation. Wilkistudent ( talk ) 02:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This award is relevant for Wikipedia documentation. Its a prestigious award worthy of encyclopedic significance. AFMRwesternsection ( talk ) 09:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 26. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 02:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Ross HillTalk to me! 03:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non periodical, non significant reward or event fails WP:NEVENTS and WP:GNG. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 04:44, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 19:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree this award is relevant for Wiki documentation. Wilkistudent ( talk ) 02:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This award is relevant for Wikipedia documentation. Its a prestigious award worthy of encyclopedic significance. AFMRwesternsection ( talk ) 09:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. No compelling, policy-backed arguments have been made for the inclusion of this article. Therefore, this article's subject is found to not have the required notability at this time. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<font color="#009900">have a cup</font>]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<font color="#4682b4">beans</font>]] // </small> 18:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 ===[[Edwin E. Osgood Award]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|Edwin E. Osgood Award}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin E. Osgood Award|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 2#{{anchorencode:Edwin E. Osgood Award}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edwin_E._Osgood_Award Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 16: / Line 22: @@
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
-:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 19:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 19:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 *I disagree this  award is relevant for Wiki documentation. '''[[User:Wilkistudent| Wilkistudent]]''' ([[User talk:Wilkistudent| talk ]]) 02:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)<br />
 *This  award is relevant for Wikipedia documentation.  Its a prestigious award worthy of encyclopedic significance. '''[[User:AFMRwesternsection| AFMRwesternsection]]''' ([[User talk:AFMRwesternsection| talk ]]) 09:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)<br />
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>