Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leoesb1032: Difference between revisions
Leoesb1032 (talk | contribs) →Comments by other users: Defense |
Leoesb1032 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
:I was very sorry to hear that someone would actually accuse me of this. I learned my lessons long ago. I don't want to risk anything again. [[User:Leoesb1032|Leoesb1032]] ([[User talk:Leoesb1032|talk]]) 13:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC) |
:I was very sorry to hear that someone would actually accuse me of this. I learned my lessons long ago. I don't want to risk anything again. I have simply been trying to work as well on Wikipedia as I can. Please, I have done nothing wrong. [[User:Leoesb1032|Leoesb1032]] ([[User talk:Leoesb1032|talk]]) 13:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
Revision as of 13:29, 13 January 2014
Leoesb1032
Leoesb1032 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leoesb1032/Archive.
13 January 2014
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- FranklynJimenez777 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
User:Leoesb1032 has a history of socking, as User:Matthewb103 in April to May 2013, to support an RfC started by Leoesb1032 at Centralia mine fire. This time, User:FranklynJimenez777 was used in a good hand, bad hand manner to perform test edits, allowing Leoesb1032 to issue a warning, and then for FranklynJimenez777 to award a barnstar to Leoesb1032. The strangely formal English used in the barnstar is similar to that of Leoesb1032, not to mention that a new editor has somehow graduated from test edits to barnstar awarding within 25 minutes. FranklynJimenez777 did not award a barnstar to ClueBot NG for the second warning on his page and Leoesb1032 did not thank FranklynJimenez777 for the barnstar, though he engages with everyone else who edits his Talk page, but simply added the text to his User page. The FranklynJimenez777 account was created at 00:48, 12 January 2014 and edits started at 00:51, while there was a gap in Leoesb1032's editing between 00:24 and 01:03. Some of this evidence is circumstantial, I will admit, but considered together I find it rather good evidence. At the very least, we should look for sleeper socks as Leoesb1032 has used at one in the past. Woodroar (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- I was very sorry to hear that someone would actually accuse me of this. I learned my lessons long ago. I don't want to risk anything again. I have simply been trying to work as well on Wikipedia as I can. Please, I have done nothing wrong. Leoesb1032 (talk) 13:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)