Talk:Debt buyer (United States): Difference between revisions
→It is not illegal for a Junk Debt Buyer to sue: new section |
m Signing comment by 98.239.250.100 - "→It is not illegal for a Junk Debt Buyer to sue: new section" |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== It is not illegal for a Junk Debt Buyer to sue == |
== It is not illegal for a Junk Debt Buyer to sue == |
||
Junk Debt Buyers through their representatives sue all the time 365 days a year. The courts do not stop them. They accept the filings and documentation no matter how dodgy the paperwork it. It is not illegal. It should be. The consumer is left with the only option available to him, to defend themselves. |
Junk Debt Buyers through their representatives sue all the time 365 days a year. The courts do not stop them. They accept the filings and documentation no matter how dodgy the paperwork it. It is not illegal. It should be. The consumer is left with the only option available to him, to defend themselves. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.239.250.100|98.239.250.100]] ([[User talk:98.239.250.100|talk]]) 17:35, 29 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 17:36, 29 January 2014
Business Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Page move to "Debt Sales & Acquisitions"
The sources in this article and in the industry in general don't support moving this page to "Debt Sales & Acquisitions". That looks to me like a sanitized name that may be preferred by some, but is not the name commonly used. The leading trade association is DBA, which stood for Debt Buyers Association, until they apparently decided to be known simply as DBA.--Kubigula (talk) 03:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
It is not illegal for a Junk Debt Buyer to sue
Junk Debt Buyers through their representatives sue all the time 365 days a year. The courts do not stop them. They accept the filings and documentation no matter how dodgy the paperwork it. It is not illegal. It should be. The consumer is left with the only option available to him, to defend themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.239.250.100 (talk) 17:35, 29 January 2014 (UTC)