Sokolsky Opening: Difference between revisions
m →Details: Task 1c: Fix CS1 deprecated date parameter errors |
m Task 5: Fix CS1 deprecated coauthor parameter errors |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The opening has never been popular at the top level, though a number of prominent players have employed it on occasion (for example, [[Richard Réti]] against Abraham Speijer in [[Scheveningen]] 1923 and [[Boris Spassky]] against [[Vasily Smyslov]] in the 1960 Moscow–[[Saint Petersburg|Leningrad]] match). [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] player [[Alexey Sokolsky|Alexei Pavlovich Sokolsky]] (1908–69) wrote a monograph on this opening in 1963, ''Debyut 1 b2–b4''. |
The opening has never been popular at the top level, though a number of prominent players have employed it on occasion (for example, [[Richard Réti]] against Abraham Speijer in [[Scheveningen]] 1923 and [[Boris Spassky]] against [[Vasily Smyslov]] in the 1960 Moscow–[[Saint Petersburg|Leningrad]] match). [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] player [[Alexey Sokolsky|Alexei Pavlovich Sokolsky]] (1908–69) wrote a monograph on this opening in 1963, ''Debyut 1 b2–b4''. |
||
Perhaps its most famous use came in the game [[Savielly Tartakower|Tartakower]] versus [[Géza Maróczy|Maróczy]], in the [[New York 1924 chess tournament]] on March 21, 1924.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1094341 |title=Savielly Tartakower vs Geza Maroczy |accessdate=2008-01-20 |last= |first |
Perhaps its most famous use came in the game [[Savielly Tartakower|Tartakower]] versus [[Géza Maróczy|Maróczy]], in the [[New York 1924 chess tournament]] on March 21, 1924.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1094341 |title=Savielly Tartakower vs Geza Maroczy |accessdate=2008-01-20 |last= |first= |work= |publisher=Chessgames.com}}</ref> The name "Orangutan Opening" originates from that game: the players visited the [[Bronx Zoo]] the previous day, where Tartakower consulted an [[orangutan]] named Susan, and she somehow indicated, Tartakower insisted, that he should open with b4. Also Tartakower noted that the climbing movement of the pawn to b5 reminded him of the orangutan. In that particular game, Tartakower came out of the opening with a decent position, but the game was drawn.<ref>Weinreb, Michael. "Kings of New York". Gotham Books. 2007</ref><ref>Danelishen, Gary; M. “The Final Theory of Chess”. Phillidore Press 2008 ISBN 978-0981567709</ref> Alekhine, who played in the tournament and wrote a book on it, said that 1.b4 was an old move, and that the problem is that it reveals White’s intentions, before White knows what Black’s intentions are.<ref>Alekhine, Alexander. “New York 1924”. Russell Enterprises, Inc. 2009 p. 64 ISBN 978-1888690484</ref> |
||
The opening is largely based upon tactics on the [[queenside]] or the f6- and g7-squares. Black can respond in a variety of ways: For example, Black can make a claim on the centre (which White's first move ignores) with 1...d5 (possibly followed by 2.Bb2 Qd6, attacking b4 and supporting e7–e5),<ref>{{Cite web | last=Martin | first=Andrew | title=How To Meet The Polish & Grob | year=2004 | url=http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_bits_pieces/041001_h_t_,mt_plsh_grb.html | publisher=www.jeremysilman.com | postscript=<!--None-->}}</ref> 1...e5 or 1...f5. Less ambitious moves like 1...Nf6, 1...c6 (called the Outflank Variation, preparing ...Qb6 or ...a5), and 1...e6 are also reasonable. Rarer attempts have been made with 1...a5 or 1...c5. Black's reply 1...e6 is usually followed by ...d5, ...Nf6 and an eventual ...c5. After 1.b4 e5 it is normal for White to ignore the attack on the b-pawn and play 2.Bb2, when 2...d6, 2...f6, and 2...Bxb4 are all playable. After 1...a5 White will most likely play 2.b5 and take advantage of Black's queenside weakness. Black's 1...c5 is much sharper and more aggressive and is normally used to avoid theory. After the capture Black will generally place pressure on the c5-square and will develop an attack against White's weak queenside structure. |
The opening is largely based upon tactics on the [[queenside]] or the f6- and g7-squares. Black can respond in a variety of ways: For example, Black can make a claim on the centre (which White's first move ignores) with 1...d5 (possibly followed by 2.Bb2 Qd6, attacking b4 and supporting e7–e5),<ref>{{Cite web | last=Martin | first=Andrew | title=How To Meet The Polish & Grob | year=2004 | url=http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_bits_pieces/041001_h_t_,mt_plsh_grb.html | publisher=www.jeremysilman.com | postscript=<!--None-->}}</ref> 1...e5 or 1...f5. Less ambitious moves like 1...Nf6, 1...c6 (called the Outflank Variation, preparing ...Qb6 or ...a5), and 1...e6 are also reasonable. Rarer attempts have been made with 1...a5 or 1...c5. Black's reply 1...e6 is usually followed by ...d5, ...Nf6 and an eventual ...c5. After 1.b4 e5 it is normal for White to ignore the attack on the b-pawn and play 2.Bb2, when 2...d6, 2...f6, and 2...Bxb4 are all playable. After 1...a5 White will most likely play 2.b5 and take advantage of Black's queenside weakness. Black's 1...c5 is much sharper and more aggressive and is normally used to avoid theory. After the capture Black will generally place pressure on the c5-square and will develop an attack against White's weak queenside structure. |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
'''Bibliography''' |
'''Bibliography''' |
||
{{refbegin}} |
{{refbegin}} |
||
*{{cite book | authorlink=David Vincent Hooper|last=Hooper|first=David | |
*{{cite book | authorlink=David Vincent Hooper|last=Hooper|first=David |author2=Kenneth Whyld | title=[[The Oxford Companion to Chess]] | publisher=Oxford University | year=1996 | isbn=0-19-280049-3}} |
||
*{{Cite book | last=Dunnington | first=Angus | author-link=Angus Dunnington | year=2000 | title=Winning Unorthodox Openings | publisher=Everyman Chess | isbn=978-1-85744-285-4 | postscript=<!--None--> }} |
*{{Cite book | last=Dunnington | first=Angus | author-link=Angus Dunnington | year=2000 | title=Winning Unorthodox Openings | publisher=Everyman Chess | isbn=978-1-85744-285-4 | postscript=<!--None--> }} |
||
*{{cite book | author=[[Eric Schiller]] | year=2002 | edition=Second | title=Unorthodox Chess Openings | publisher=Cardoza | isbn=1-58042-072-9 }} p. 354-357 |
*{{cite book | author=[[Eric Schiller]] | year=2002 | edition=Second | title=Unorthodox Chess Openings | publisher=Cardoza | isbn=1-58042-072-9 }} p. 354-357 |
||
*{{cite book | author=Yury Lapshun | |
*{{cite book | author=Yury Lapshun |author2=Nick Conticello | title=Play 1b4!: Shock your opponents with the Sokolsky | publisher=Everyman Chess | year=2008 | isbn=978-1-85744-560-2}} |
||
*[[Jerzy Konikowski]] und Marek Soszynski: ''The Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 in Theory & Practice''. Russell Enterprises, Milford USA 2009, ISBN 978-1-888690-65-1 |
*[[Jerzy Konikowski]] und Marek Soszynski: ''The Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 in Theory & Practice''. Russell Enterprises, Milford USA 2009, ISBN 978-1-888690-65-1 |
||
{{refend}} |
{{refend}} |
Revision as of 12:03, 24 July 2014
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moves | 1. b4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO | A00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Named after | Alexei Pavlovich Sokolsky | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Irregular chess opening | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synonym(s) | Orangutan Opening Polish Opening Hunt Opening |
The Sokolsky Opening (also known as the Orangutan, Polish, or Hunt Opening) is an uncommon chess opening that begins with the move:
- 1. b4
According to various databases, out of the twenty possible first moves from White, the move 1.b4 ranks ninth in popularity.[1] It is considered an irregular opening, so it is classified under the A00 code in the Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings (ECO).
Details
The opening has never been popular at the top level, though a number of prominent players have employed it on occasion (for example, Richard Réti against Abraham Speijer in Scheveningen 1923 and Boris Spassky against Vasily Smyslov in the 1960 Moscow–Leningrad match). Soviet player Alexei Pavlovich Sokolsky (1908–69) wrote a monograph on this opening in 1963, Debyut 1 b2–b4.
Perhaps its most famous use came in the game Tartakower versus Maróczy, in the New York 1924 chess tournament on March 21, 1924.[2] The name "Orangutan Opening" originates from that game: the players visited the Bronx Zoo the previous day, where Tartakower consulted an orangutan named Susan, and she somehow indicated, Tartakower insisted, that he should open with b4. Also Tartakower noted that the climbing movement of the pawn to b5 reminded him of the orangutan. In that particular game, Tartakower came out of the opening with a decent position, but the game was drawn.[3][4] Alekhine, who played in the tournament and wrote a book on it, said that 1.b4 was an old move, and that the problem is that it reveals White’s intentions, before White knows what Black’s intentions are.[5]
The opening is largely based upon tactics on the queenside or the f6- and g7-squares. Black can respond in a variety of ways: For example, Black can make a claim on the centre (which White's first move ignores) with 1...d5 (possibly followed by 2.Bb2 Qd6, attacking b4 and supporting e7–e5),[6] 1...e5 or 1...f5. Less ambitious moves like 1...Nf6, 1...c6 (called the Outflank Variation, preparing ...Qb6 or ...a5), and 1...e6 are also reasonable. Rarer attempts have been made with 1...a5 or 1...c5. Black's reply 1...e6 is usually followed by ...d5, ...Nf6 and an eventual ...c5. After 1.b4 e5 it is normal for White to ignore the attack on the b-pawn and play 2.Bb2, when 2...d6, 2...f6, and 2...Bxb4 are all playable. After 1...a5 White will most likely play 2.b5 and take advantage of Black's queenside weakness. Black's 1...c5 is much sharper and more aggressive and is normally used to avoid theory. After the capture Black will generally place pressure on the c5-square and will develop an attack against White's weak queenside structure.
See also
References
Notes
- ^ See for example ChessBase, 365chess opening explorer, and ChessGames.com opening explorer
- ^ "Savielly Tartakower vs Geza Maroczy". Chessgames.com. Retrieved 2008-01-20.
- ^ Weinreb, Michael. "Kings of New York". Gotham Books. 2007
- ^ Danelishen, Gary; M. “The Final Theory of Chess”. Phillidore Press 2008 ISBN 978-0981567709
- ^ Alekhine, Alexander. “New York 1924”. Russell Enterprises, Inc. 2009 p. 64 ISBN 978-1888690484
- ^ Martin, Andrew (2004). "How To Meet The Polish & Grob". www.jeremysilman.com.
Bibliography
- Hooper, David; Kenneth Whyld (1996). The Oxford Companion to Chess. Oxford University. ISBN 0-19-280049-3.
- Dunnington, Angus (2000). Winning Unorthodox Openings. Everyman Chess. ISBN 978-1-85744-285-4.
- Eric Schiller (2002). Unorthodox Chess Openings (Second ed.). Cardoza. ISBN 1-58042-072-9. p. 354-357
- Yury Lapshun; Nick Conticello (2008). Play 1b4!: Shock your opponents with the Sokolsky. Everyman Chess. ISBN 978-1-85744-560-2.
- Jerzy Konikowski und Marek Soszynski: The Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 in Theory & Practice. Russell Enterprises, Milford USA 2009, ISBN 978-1-888690-65-1