Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Keith: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Jeremy Keith: indent |
delete, blp1e |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:An Act to rehabilitate offenders who have not been reconvicted of any serious offence for periods of years, to penalise the unauthorised disclosure of their previous convictions, to amend the law of defamation, and for purposes connected therewith.). |
:An Act to rehabilitate offenders who have not been reconvicted of any serious offence for periods of years, to penalise the unauthorised disclosure of their previous convictions, to amend the law of defamation, and for purposes connected therewith.). |
||
It will then become libellous to publish that information. Just to remove the conviction data would leave a very poor article that is unlikely to ever expand. Bit of a [[WP:BLP1E]] '''[[User:Ronhjones|<span style="border:1px solid;color:#dfdfdf; padding:1px;background:#ffffdf"><font color="green"> Ron<font color="red">h</font>jones </font></span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Ronhjones| (Talk)]]</sup> 19:32, 14 April 2014 (UTC) |
It will then become libellous to publish that information. Just to remove the conviction data would leave a very poor article that is unlikely to ever expand. Bit of a [[WP:BLP1E]] '''[[User:Ronhjones|<span style="border:1px solid;color:#dfdfdf; padding:1px;background:#ffffdf"><font color="green"> Ron<font color="red">h</font>jones </font></span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Ronhjones| (Talk)]]</sup> 19:32, 14 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act situation has little currency for me as I am not beholden to British law (nor is Wikipedia in general). On the other hand, this is pretty much a canonical [[WP:BLP1E]]/[[WP:CRIME]] situation, unless there are some appropriate sources that I'm unable to find. [[User:Squeamish Ossifrage|Squeamish Ossifrage]] ([[User talk:Squeamish Ossifrage|talk]]) 19:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:59, 14 April 2014
- Jeremy Keith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Request via OTRS 2011121310011536 - This article deals mainly with the offence committed in 2007. In five days time this offence will be classed as spent under UK Law
- (Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974
- 1974 CHAPTER 53
- An Act to rehabilitate offenders who have not been reconvicted of any serious offence for periods of years, to penalise the unauthorised disclosure of their previous convictions, to amend the law of defamation, and for purposes connected therewith.).
It will then become libellous to publish that information. Just to remove the conviction data would leave a very poor article that is unlikely to ever expand. Bit of a WP:BLP1E Ronhjones (Talk) 19:32, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act situation has little currency for me as I am not beholden to British law (nor is Wikipedia in general). On the other hand, this is pretty much a canonical WP:BLP1E/WP:CRIME situation, unless there are some appropriate sources that I'm unable to find. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)