Talk:Jonti Picking: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:15, 21 August 2014

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Animation: People Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animation people work group.

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Template:Findsourcesnotice

The First Content Ever Added To This Talk Page

Other sites are stealing information from Wikipedia wholesale and I can't believe no one around here gives a damn!

Look: http://www.free-definition.com/Jonti-Picking.html They even left text with "Wikipedia" in it!

Er, yeah, I dunno if you are aware of this, but all wikipedia content is licensed under the GNU FDL, and therefore its perfectly acceptable to copy it (given conditions) ... dullard.

from Vfd

On 8 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jonti Picking for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 17:06, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

Merger? No!

The article Weebl's cartoons has too much information in it to allow for a merger, unless various info is cut out.

The Best Reason for Separate Articles:

If the Weebls cartoons page was merged into the Jonti Picking page, viewers of his animations that didn't know his name would not be able to get info about his other animations, AND HIS NAME.

If the Jonti Picking page was merged into the Weebls page then it would probably be too bloated. Plus, wouldn't the Weebl entry need to be listed first in case an internet searcher typed in Weebl, and then gets dumped onto a "Jonti Picking" page?

How would that support search engine relevancy?

In my opinion, merging seems to hold many more disadvantages than separate pages with a link.

What's wrong with just using a link from his name to his name page? I checked this link, and it works!!

Again, I'd say disagree to merging and keep this article - there's so much info on his cartoons on the other page that it seems sensible to split the page about himself off from the various animations from his web page. The links asking about article merger have been there for a long time now - any chance of removing them? C2r 09:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't merge the articles, they're separate things, stop coming up with insane ideas because you admins are bored. 81.101.229.176 22:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason to merge the two articles, they are different subjects. There are articles on skoo and other animators, and just because he's the main man on the site doesn't mean he should be a subheading of something. Leave the articles seperate. 86.43.197.83 19:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Favour There's no real content on the Weebl's Toons article. In fact that article is made up almost entirely of paragraphs which are simply explanations (original research?) of the Toons which you can get by a) visiting weebls-stuff website and b) watching the Toons yourself. Having them all listed and described (many of the Toons of which are not notable in and of themselves) is like having an article explaining all the various movies available at somewhere like newgrounds.com or having articles for every YouTube video ever made. The more notable shows like Webbl and Bob deserve their own articles but we don't need a text explanation of every Weebl Toon ever made. Link to the website and let people find out for themselves. This is starting to become like Pokemon and we all know what happened to those articles... Yay unto the Chicken (talk) 23:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis or Willis

"He is also an admitted fan of Elvis, Wesley Willis, and used his music in the cartoon "Merry Christmas"[1]."

Used whose music? Also, it should say "Elvis and Wesley Willis,".202.53.198.81 (talk) 20:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resident Evil

I suggest that the Resident Evil comment be removed. For starters there's no citation. Secondly, it wasn't Jonti but one of his co-workers at Sumo Dojo Productions that did the CGI for all of the wire-frame overviews of the Hive. It was on the old website, but the information isn't there any more. I will contact Sumo Dojo in order for them to clarify this.

Jonti says here that it was him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.14.241.135 (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weebl's Stuff article

I think it's rather silly that there's pages for Jonti, the cartoons, Badgers, On the moon, etc, but the page for Weebl's Stuff, which everything revolves around, keeps getting deleted and redirected here. Weebl's Stuff at the moment, is not just Jonti but several other animators and staff, which have produced various commercial work and is rather noticeable. I think it more than deserves its own article. Wonchop (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added Admittedly-Bull**** Section Header To Inaugural Edits

The unsigned comments (now) in the section "The First Content Ever Added To This Talk Page" represent the first and third edits to this talk page, and were originally dropped in bare, at the page level. I stuck a section header on them so that the Contents box would slide up above that text, where (I'd argue) it belongs. This seems, to me, to be acceptable per WP:TALKO. Anyone, but especially the editors who originally posted those comments, should feel free to revert if you find this objectionable. FeRD_NYC (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Savlonic Redirect?

Why does Savlonic redirect here? Not only is he not a member of the band, but there's literally no mention of them on this page, so it's a useless redirect. Irockz (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 ==Added Admittedly-Bull**** Section Header To Inaugural Edits==
 The unsigned comments (now) in the section "The First Content Ever Added To This Talk Page" represent the first and third edits to this talk page, and were originally dropped in bare, at the page level. I stuck a section header on them so that the Contents box would slide up ''above'' that text, where (I'd argue) it belongs. This seems, to me, to be acceptable per [[WP:TALKO]]. Anyone, but especially the editors who originally posted those comments, should feel free to revert if you find this objectionable. [[User:FeRD NYC|FeRD_NYC]] ([[User talk:FeRD NYC|talk]]) 05:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
+== Savlonic Redirect? ==
+Why does Savlonic redirect here? Not only is he not a member of the band, but there's literally no mention of them on this page, so it's a useless redirect. [[User:Irockz|Irockz]] ([[User talk:Irockz|talk]]) 03:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)