Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De chateau: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:07, 28 June 2006

De chateau

Delete Non-notable game map. Prod was removed without comment Gwernol 15:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Very derivative cruft.--Fuhghettaboutit 15:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The map is just as notable as the other featured in List of Counter-Strike maps. It is an official map in both Counter-Strike 1.6 and Counter-Strike: Source. This map has an equal amount of content as the others, but could be tagged as a stub, if lack of content is your concern. I was the person who removed the prod tag after spending an hour adding content, because as the tag reads "You may remove this message if you improve the article, or if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason." As far as I know, I followed protocol to the letter of the law, and yet we're served up for AfD. Does the nominator have a specific grudge against this map, this game, or me? David Bergan 15:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I agree that it is as notable as the other intergame maps, and believe that they are all derivative, non-notable fictional universe items that collectively should be deleted as autonomous articles; the coverage should end at Counter-Strike maps, which can be appropriately expanded.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:43, 28 June 2006 edit Vanished user psdfiwnef3niurunfiuh234ruhfwdb7 (talk \| contribs) 1,848 edits m →[[De chateau]] ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:07, 28 June 2006 edit undo Fuhghettaboutit (talk \| contribs) 85,115 edits Comment Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	*'''Keep''' The map is just as notable as the other featured in [[List of Counter-Strike maps]]. It is an official map in both [[Counter-Strike\|Counter-Strike 1.6]] and [[Counter-Strike: Source]]. This map has an equal amount of content as the others, but could be tagged as a stub, if lack of content is your concern. I was the person who removed the prod tag after spending an hour adding content, because as the tag reads "You may remove this message if you improve the article, or if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason." As far as I know, I followed protocol to the letter of the law, and yet we're served up for AfD. Does the nominator have a specific grudge against this map, this game, or me? [[User:Dbergan\|David Bergan]] 15:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)		*'''Keep''' The map is just as notable as the other featured in [[List of Counter-Strike maps]]. It is an official map in both [[Counter-Strike\|Counter-Strike 1.6]] and [[Counter-Strike: Source]]. This map has an equal amount of content as the others, but could be tagged as a stub, if lack of content is your concern. I was the person who removed the prod tag after spending an hour adding content, because as the tag reads "You may remove this message if you improve the article, or if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason." As far as I know, I followed protocol to the letter of the law, and yet we're served up for AfD. Does the nominator have a specific grudge against this map, this game, or me? [[User:Dbergan\|David Bergan]] 15:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
			**'''Comment'''. I agree that it is as notable as the other intergame maps, and believe that they are all derivative, non-notable fictional universe items that collectively should be deleted as autonomous articles; the coverage should end at [[Counter-Strike maps]], which can be appropriately expanded.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit\|Fuhghettaboutit]] 16:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)