Tricritical point: Difference between revisions
Roberto DR (talk | contribs) m tricitical -> tricritical point of the superconductor |
Type I superconductor linked to Type II |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
roughly |
roughly |
||
<math>\kappa=0.76/\sqrt{2}</math>, i.e., slightly below the value <math>\kappa=1/\sqrt{2}</math> |
<math>\kappa=0.76/\sqrt{2}</math>, i.e., slightly below the value <math>\kappa=1/\sqrt{2}</math> |
||
where [[Type |
where [[Type I superconductor|type-I]] goes over into [[Type II superconductor|type-II]] superconductor. |
||
The prediction was confirmed in 2002 by [[Computer simulation|Monte Carlo computer simulations]].<ref> |
The prediction was confirmed in 2002 by [[Computer simulation|Monte Carlo computer simulations]].<ref> |
||
{{cite journal |
{{cite journal |
||
Revision as of 00:39, 21 August 2014
In condensed matter physics, dealing with the macroscopic physical properties of matter, a tricritical point is a point in the phase diagram of a system at which three-phase coexistence terminates.[1] This definition is clearly parallel to the definition of an ordinary critical point as the point at which two-phase coexistence terminates.
A point of three-phase coexistence is termed a triple point for a one-component system, since, from Gibbs' phase rule, this condition is only achieved for a single point in the phase diagram (F=2-3+1=0). For tricritical points to be observed, one needs a mixture with more components. It can be shown[2] that three is the minimum number of components for which these points can appear. In this case, one may have a two-dimensional region of three-phase coexistence (F=2-3+3=2) (thus, each point in this region corresponds to a triple point). This region will terminate in two critical lines of phase coexistence; these two critical lines may then terminate at a single tricritical point. This point is therefore "twice critical", since it belong to two critical branches. Indeed, its critical behavior is different from that of a conventional critical point: the upper critical dimension is lowered from d=4 to d=3 so the classical exponents turn out to apply for real systems in three dimensions (but not for systems whose spatial dimension is 2 or lower).
It seems more convenient [citation needed] experimentally to consider mixtures with four components for which one thermodynamic variable (usually the pressure or the volume) is kept fixed. The situation then reduces to the one described for mixtures of three components.
Historically, it was for a long time unclear whether a superconductor undergoes a first- or a second-order phase transition. The question was finally settled in 1982.[3] If the Ginzburg-Landau parameter that distinguishes type-I and type-II superconductors (see also here) is large enough, vortex fluctuations becomes important which drive the transition to second order .[4] The tricritical point lies at roughly , i.e., slightly below the value where type-I goes over into type-II superconductor. The prediction was confirmed in 2002 by Monte Carlo computer simulations.[5]
References
- ^ B. Widom, Theory of Phase Equilibrium, J. Phys. Chem 1996, 100, 13190-13199
- ^ ibid.
- ^ H. Kleinert (1982). "Disorder Version of the Abelian Higgs Model and the Order of the Superconductive Phase Transition" (PDF). Lett. Nuovo Cimento. 35: 405–412. doi:10.1007/BF02754760.
- ^ H. Kleinert (2006). "Vortex Origin of Tricritical Point in Ginzburg-Landau Theory" (PDF). Europh. Letters. 74: 889. arXiv:cond-mat/0509430. Bibcode:2006EL.....74..889K. doi:10.1209/epl/i2006-10029-5.
- ^
J. Hove, S. Mo, A. Sudbo (2002). "Vortex interactions and thermally induced crossover from type-I to type-II superconductivity" (PDF). Phys. Rev. B 66: 064524. arXiv:cond-mat/0202215. Bibcode:2002PhRvB..66f4524H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.064524.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)