Talk:Creature of Havoc: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Signing comment by 31.185.155.56 - "" |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
: No one insulted you, so I'd appreciate it if you reciprocated the courtesy. As for the rest, all you had to do was listen. You can't expect to be taken seriously and not "run out of town" when you can't even be bothered to sign your posts. Think about it. [[User:Asgardian|Asgardian]] ([[User talk:Asgardian|talk]]) 11:45, 9 August 2014 (UTC) |
: No one insulted you, so I'd appreciate it if you reciprocated the courtesy. As for the rest, all you had to do was listen. You can't expect to be taken seriously and not "run out of town" when you can't even be bothered to sign your posts. Think about it. [[User:Asgardian|Asgardian]] ([[User talk:Asgardian|talk]]) 11:45, 9 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
As I said, Wikipedia is dying, and it's beacause of milk monitoring popinjays like you. |
As I said, Wikipedia is dying, and it's beacause of milk monitoring popinjays like you. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/31.185.155.56|31.185.155.56]] ([[User talk:31.185.155.56|talk]]) 12:02, 9 August 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 12:03, 9 August 2014
 | You may prefer to discuss this article on the talk page for the List of Fighting Fantasy gamebooks article |
Paragraph 213
Paragraph 213 of Creature of Havoc is one of the most controversial paragraphs in all of Fighting Fantasy. Don't delete this again.
- Regarding this matter, there are a few points:
- The passage was removed as it is unsourced original research and smacks of personal opinion, or point of view. Yes, there are certain features of this particular title that can be discussed, but they must be mentioned in a clinical manner - with sources - that befits an encyclopedia. Shortly I will be tackling this article and hopefully bring it up to standard.
- Based on the above, I was correct in performing a revert, which Babitaarora enforced. This then becomes consensus regarding the matter.
- Please don't make blunt statements such "Do don't delete this again".
- Please Sign all posts.
Thank you in advance for your co-operation. Asgardian (talk) 03:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Two people is not a consensus. Check out the reams of discussion in various places about CoH Paragraph#213. I'm not intrerested in arguing with you further. Don't delete this again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.185.155.56 (talk) 07:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
All I wanted to do was put an interesting, yet uncontroversial piece of information about possibly the most debated paragraph in Fighting Fantasy, I didn't give my opion on the matter. It's people like you who are killing Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.185.155.56 (talk) 08:51, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- No one insulted you, so I'd appreciate it if you reciprocated the courtesy. As for the rest, all you had to do was listen. You can't expect to be taken seriously and not "run out of town" when you can't even be bothered to sign your posts. Think about it. Asgardian (talk) 11:45, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
As I said, Wikipedia is dying, and it's beacause of milk monitoring popinjays like you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.185.155.56 (talk) 12:02, 9 August 2014 (UTC)