Cognitive training: Difference between revisions
Undoing change with stolen copyrighted text and running an advertising campaign for neuroludus |
Mtedesco203 (talk | contribs) m Corrected spelling |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{for|the Brain Training [[video game]] franchise|Brain Age (series)}} |
{{for|the Brain Training [[video game]] franchise|Brain Age (series)}} |
||
'''Brain training''' aims to enhance cognitive function through repetitive practice, and is analogous to enhancing physical strength or fitness through exercise. It is often administered through the regular use of computerised tests. This has commercial appeal to both consumers and healthcare practitioners, and while programs such as [[ |
'''Brain training''' aims to enhance cognitive function through repetitive practice, and is analogous to enhancing physical strength or fitness through exercise. It is often administered through the regular use of computerised tests. This has commercial appeal to both consumers and healthcare practitioners, and while programs such as [[Lumosity]] have developed into a lucrative industry, claims concerning the impact and duration of such brain training largely unsubstantiated.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Rabipour|first=Sheida|author2=Amir Raz|title=Training the brain: fact and fad in cognitive and behavioural remediation|journal=Brain and Cognition|date=July 2012|volume=79|issue=2}}</ref> |
||
The central question is not whether performance on cognitive tests can be improved by training, but rather, whether those benefits transfer to other untrained tasks or lead to any general improvement in the level of cognitive functioning. Studies have shown that although improvements are observed in specific cognitive tasks that were trained, no evidence was found for transfer effects to untrained tasks, even when those tasks were cognitively closely related.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Owen|first=Adrian|author2=et al|title=Putting brain training to the test|journal=Nature|date=June 2010|volume=465|pages=775–779|doi=10.1038/nature09042}}</ref> |
The central question is not whether performance on cognitive tests can be improved by training, but rather, whether those benefits transfer to other untrained tasks or lead to any general improvement in the level of cognitive functioning. Studies have shown that although improvements are observed in specific cognitive tasks that were trained, no evidence was found for transfer effects to untrained tasks, even when those tasks were cognitively closely related.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Owen|first=Adrian|author2=et al|title=Putting brain training to the test|journal=Nature|date=June 2010|volume=465|pages=775–779|doi=10.1038/nature09042}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 14:56, 13 October 2014
Brain training aims to enhance cognitive function through repetitive practice, and is analogous to enhancing physical strength or fitness through exercise. It is often administered through the regular use of computerised tests. This has commercial appeal to both consumers and healthcare practitioners, and while programs such as Lumosity have developed into a lucrative industry, claims concerning the impact and duration of such brain training largely unsubstantiated.[1]
The central question is not whether performance on cognitive tests can be improved by training, but rather, whether those benefits transfer to other untrained tasks or lead to any general improvement in the level of cognitive functioning. Studies have shown that although improvements are observed in specific cognitive tasks that were trained, no evidence was found for transfer effects to untrained tasks, even when those tasks were cognitively closely related.[2]
See also
References
- ^ Rabipour, Sheida; Amir Raz (July 2012). "Training the brain: fact and fad in cognitive and behavioural remediation". Brain and Cognition. 79 (2).
- ^ Owen, Adrian; et al. (June 2010). "Putting brain training to the test". Nature. 465: 775–779. doi:10.1038/nature09042.
{{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in:|author2=(help)