Talk:Asiana Airlines Flight 733: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:14, 27 October 2014

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asiana Airlines Flight 733 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disaster management

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Course Assignment Information

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2014. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Washington/Interpersonal Media (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Class review

Hi, just made minor edits added "members" to make it 2 crew members and replaced "Japanese passengers who were among" with "Japanese nationals among" Aidaja12 (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great article! My only suggestions would be to expand on the statement, "Mokpo Airport was only equipped with VOR/DME." pnwkev 01:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pnwkev (talk • contribs)

Quick comments

These are addressed to anyone, but Xxdboixx was working on expanding the article:

The sources we have here could be converted to templates (see the citation template gadget on the top of the edit window) to avoid link rot, in most cases noting the author, date and work the source was published in. That way if the link goes dead other readers can replace it with an archive link or otherwise divine what to do. If it's a bare link they won't have much luck.

Otherwise the article seems pretty good. You can probably remove the "new article" template at the top of the page whenever you like. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:14, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 Great article!  My only suggestions would be to expand on the statement, "Mokpo Airport was only equipped with VOR/DME." <span style="border:3px purple; -moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;"> pnwkev </span> 01:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pnwkev|Pnwkev]] ([[User talk:Pnwkev|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pnwkev|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Quick comments ==
+These are addressed to anyone, but {{u|Xxdboixx}} was working on expanding the article:
+* The sources we have here could be converted to templates (see the citation template gadget on the top of the edit window) to avoid [[WP:Link rot|link rot]], in most cases noting the author, date and work the source was published in. That way if the link goes dead other readers can replace it with an archive link or otherwise divine what to do. If it's a bare link they won't have much luck.
+Otherwise the article seems pretty good. You can probably remove the "new article" template at the top of the page whenever you like. [[User:Adam (Wiki Ed)|Adam (Wiki Ed)]] ([[User talk:Adam (Wiki Ed)|talk]]) 21:14, 27 October 2014 (UTC)