Talk:Akeelah and the Bee: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:25, 19 July 2006

Film Stub‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Is "The Starbucks funding raises questions pertinent to today's cinema, such as whether or not the presence of corporate sponsorship decreases the value of the art. However, due to the costs associated with filmmaking, this is a trend that will likely continue, for better or for worse" really NPOV? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trojan traveler (talk • contribs)

Name origin

is the name Akeelah invented or from some other culture?

According to this page, "Akilah" is an Arabic name meaning "intelligent, logical, one who reasons". --Mathew5000 10:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was it a boxoffice bomb?

seems like it disappeared in a week after all the months of starbuck hype. did it make any money?

Revision as of 04:38, 13 July 2006 edit 67.112.122.233 (talk) →Name origin ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:25, 19 July 2006 edit undo Bugs5382 (talk \| contribs) 3,713 edits m Changed {{FilmsWikiProject}} tag with a class Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{FilmsWikiProject}}		{{FilmsWikiProject\|class=Stub}}

	Is "The Starbucks funding raises questions pertinent to today's cinema, such as whether or not the presence of corporate sponsorship decreases the value of the art. However, due to the costs associated with filmmaking, this is a trend that will likely continue, for better or for worse" really NPOV? {{unsigned\|Trojan traveler}}		Is "The Starbucks funding raises questions pertinent to today's cinema, such as whether or not the presence of corporate sponsorship decreases the value of the art. However, due to the costs associated with filmmaking, this is a trend that will likely continue, for better or for worse" really NPOV? {{unsigned\|Trojan traveler}}