User talk:Aubmn: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:55, 13 January 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Aubmn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 20:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Babington Plot

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edits to the Babington Plot appear to be well written and in good faith, but if they remain unsourced they are liable to be reverted because they materially change the tenets of the article, even though it also suffers from inadequate sourcing. I would advise you to set up your source refernce statements early/soon, then it will not attract attention like this. Good luck, welcome and thanks. Chienlit (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC) (p.s. I will revert my initial (over zealous) reversion until you have finished your current project)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Hi, welcome to Wikipedia.
 Your recent edits to the Babington Plot appear to be well written and in good faith, but if they remain unsourced they are liable to be reverted because they materially change the tenets of the article, even though it also suffers from inadequate sourcing. I would advise you to set up your source refernce statements early/soon, then it will not attract attention like this. Good luck, welcome and thanks. [[User:Chienlit|Chienlit]] ([[User talk:Chienlit|talk]]) 15:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)    (p.s. I will revert my initial (over zealous) reversion until you have finished your current project)
-I overwrote what was there because it was redundant, out of order, and seemed basically to talk about how Antonia Fraser felt. The point is to list what happened, not discuss how a biographer speculated about motives. That can be its own page. This should be cogent to the plot itself, and tell a story.[[User:Egthegreat|Egthegreat]] ([[User talk:Egthegreat|talk]]) 06:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
-For a little more clarity - the page is about the Babington Plot. Your info about Mary would best be located on the page about Queen Mary. If you can add back the info you liked in a way that is succinct, relevant, non-repetitive, and includes clear grammatical structure, feel free. [[User:Egthegreat|Egthegreat]] ([[User talk:Egthegreat|talk]]) 06:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)