Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nicnagel1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Adding new report for Nicnagel1. |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
*Obvious. I'd blocked both the master and sock indefinitely prior to seeing this SPI, since the only goal here appears to be self-promotion. --<font face="Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<font color="blue"><strong>Kinu</strong></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<font color="red">''t''</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<font color="red">''c''</font>]]</sub></font> 21:54, 7 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 21:54, 7 February 2015
Nicnagel1
Nicnagel1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nicnagel1/Archive.
07 February 2015
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Lovetheactors (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Created same article about non notable person. Harry Let us have speaks 21:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Obvious. I'd blocked both the master and sock indefinitely prior to seeing this SPI, since the only goal here appears to be self-promotion. --Kinu t/c 21:54, 7 February 2015 (UTC)