User talk:Msmith626: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:00, 17 October 2015

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enterprise Storage OS (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enterprise Storage OS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Msmith626, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enterprise Storage OS has been accepted

Enterprise Storage OS, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 19:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 <div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed!  Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Onel5969 was:
-{{divbox|gray|<!-- no title -->|This submission does not appear to be written in [[Wikipedia:Encyclopedic style|the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article]]. Entries should be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|independent, reliable, published sources]]. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid [[Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms|peacock terms]], that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.[[Category:AfC submissions declined as not written in a neutral point of view]]|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
+{{divbox|gray|<!-- no title -->|This submission does not appear to be written in [[Wikipedia:Encyclopedic style|the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article]]. Entries should be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|independent, reliable, published sources]]. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid [[Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms|peacock terms]], that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Enterprise Storage OS]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.<!-- end cv #ifeq -->