User talk:Justthefacts2013: Difference between revisions
Please lift block |
|||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for adding [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam]] links. Persistent spammers will have their websites [[Wikipedia:Spam blacklist|blacklisted]] from Wikipedia and potentially<span class="plainlinks"> [http://www.forbes.com/2007/10/18/wikipedia-pr-spencer-tech-internet-cx_ag_1018techwikipedia.html penalized]</span> by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 19:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC)</div>[[Category:Wikipedians who have temporarily been blocked for advertising|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-sblock --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for adding [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam]] links. Persistent spammers will have their websites [[Wikipedia:Spam blacklist|blacklisted]] from Wikipedia and potentially<span class="plainlinks"> [http://www.forbes.com/2007/10/18/wikipedia-pr-spencer-tech-internet-cx_ag_1018techwikipedia.html penalized]</span> by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 19:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC)</div>[[Category:Wikipedians who have temporarily been blocked for advertising|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-sblock --> |
||
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here [[User:Justthefacts2013|Justthefacts2013]] ([[User talk:Justthefacts2013#top|talk]]) 20:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)}} I am now under the full understanding of why I was blocked and that the reference links used are considered "spam". I have since found the appropriate "non-spam" links to reference and please request to have my block lifted. Thank you so much for your consideration. |
Revision as of 20:35, 27 February 2015
Welcome!
|
February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Hilary Cruz has been reverted.
Your edit here to Hilary Cruz was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTLi0MpiMZs) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 20:22, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ronz (talk) 18:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. --Ronz (talk) 19:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 19:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Justthefacts2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[User:Justthefacts2013|Justthefacts2013]] ([[User talk:Justthefacts2013#top|talk]]) 20:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:Justthefacts2013|Justthefacts2013]] ([[User talk:Justthefacts2013#top|talk]]) 20:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:Justthefacts2013|Justthefacts2013]] ([[User talk:Justthefacts2013#top|talk]]) 20:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
I am now under the full understanding of why I was blocked and that the reference links used are considered "spam". I have since found the appropriate "non-spam" links to reference and please request to have my block lifted. Thank you so much for your consideration.