Jump to content

User talk:Kelapstick: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Username: thanks
Username: what a silly typo, damn me!
Line 40: Line 40:
:Fascinating. --[[User:kelapstick|kelapstick]]<sup>([[User talk:Kelapstick#top|bainuu]]) </sup> 19:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
:Fascinating. --[[User:kelapstick|kelapstick]]<sup>([[User talk:Kelapstick#top|bainuu]]) </sup> 19:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


Oh, I did not realise that I had been logged out when I gave you the above notification. I apologise for any confusion or misunderstanding this may have caused. I am not logging in while posting this message also because I do not wish to reveal my identity, seeing as you already know my location. As such, I will leave it to a fellow WMF agent to give you the official notification. I have just provided an advance notification here. I hope that you will create a new account and start contributing right away. I presently noticed that you are an administrator. Your adminship will not be transferred to your new account. I do think that would be much of a problem though, as adminship is [[WP:NOBIGDEAL|not a big deal]], and you can always contest a new RfA if you like. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/43.224.156.72|43.224.156.72]] ([[User talk:43.224.156.72|talk]]) 12:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Oh, I did not realise that I had been logged out when I gave you the above notification. I apologise for any confusion or misunderstanding this may have caused. I am not logging in while posting this message also because I do not wish to reveal my identity, seeing as you already know my location. As such, I will leave it to a fellow WMF agent to give you the official notification. I have just provided an advance notification here. I hope that you will create a new account and start contributing right away. I presently noticed that you are an administrator. Your adminship will not be transferred to your new account. I do not think that would be much of a problem though, as adminship is [[WP:NOBIGDEAL|not a big deal]], and you can always contest a new RfA if you like. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/43.224.156.72|43.224.156.72]] ([[User talk:43.224.156.72|talk]]) 12:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
:I think I will take my chances, thanks for stopping by. --[[User:kelapstick|kelapstick]]<sup>([[User talk:Kelapstick#top|bainuu]]) </sup> 14:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
:I think I will take my chances, thanks for stopping by. --[[User:kelapstick|kelapstick]]<sup>([[User talk:Kelapstick#top|bainuu]]) </sup> 14:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)



Revision as of 14:23, 16 March 2015

Let sleeping pugs lie.

socks and such

File:Wont you please say hello? (3474950093).jpg

Wow - that was fast. Thanks. — Ched :  ?  17:55, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Said the actress to the bishop. No worries. --kelapstick(bainuu) 17:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
LOL. That's what she said? :) — Ched :  ?  18:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Inappropriate jokes and sarcasm is really I have Ched. :) --kelapstick(bainuu) 18:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:TeleMate Unified Call Management Software

First I am new to Wikipedia posting and second thank you for the feedback but I don't understand the why mine article / post has been rejected again. I find dozens of posting of products and technologies just like mine. I am the author/founder of the technology. For example reference COMMVIEW. The layout, reference types, etc... are exactly the same. Since this my my first submission I used it as a guide. I can reference numerous others. Also from a number of reference perspective I have seen posts with 2- or 3 and those with 20-30. I assumed 7 was sufficient. Is there a magic number of them?

Please explain what you are suggesting. Thank you in advance. User:TeleMate1986 (talk) 17:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user's talk page (not linked above). --kelapstick(bainuu) 01:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subedi

Hello! Kleapstick, I had previously created a page with the name Subedi. (You had deleted it). I don't know why did you delete it. I think that the format of the article wasn't right. I am recreating the article. Please help me improve the article. I am taking reference from the article Ghimire. It is also a caste of our country  Nepal and I think it is the perfect page for me to take reference from.... Please help me or contact me on my talk page. AnuzSubedi2000 (talk) 08:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AnuzSubedi2000 (talk · contribs), I didn't delete the article, I deleted a redirect after the article was moved. The article was moved to Draft:Subedi, but now you have recreated the article, so there is both a draft and an article. --kelapstick(bainuu) 11:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Fascinating!

A recent overlay of the username rules released by the Wikimedia Foundation has dislawed the type of usernames as the one used by you. As a result, your account is under scrutiny and shall be blocked by a WMF system administrator or steward or a local sysop in a few days. Owing to reasons concerning privacy, we are unable to share any further details with you. You are not allowed to request a username change. However, you are invited to create a new account and continue contributing to Wikipedia. We apologise for any inconvenience caused. Thanks. For WMF, 43.224.156.72 (talk) 18:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fascinating. --kelapstick(bainuu) 19:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I did not realise that I had been logged out when I gave you the above notification. I apologise for any confusion or misunderstanding this may have caused. I am not logging in while posting this message also because I do not wish to reveal my identity, seeing as you already know my location. As such, I will leave it to a fellow WMF agent to give you the official notification. I have just provided an advance notification here. I hope that you will create a new account and start contributing right away. I presently noticed that you are an administrator. Your adminship will not be transferred to your new account. I do not think that would be much of a problem though, as adminship is not a big deal, and you can always contest a new RfA if you like. Thanks, 43.224.156.72 (talk) 12:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will take my chances, thanks for stopping by. --kelapstick(bainuu) 14:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball Hockey World Championship

What happened at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball Hockey World Championship? The debate had already been closed in January. Have I missed something? SpinningSpark 17:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Spinningspark, no it looks like I missed something. Thanks for bringing it up. Fixed it. --kelapstick(bainuu) 17:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mining and bacon

I saw on your user page that you are only interested in mining and bacon. That is very sad, so I wrote this article for you. SpinningSpark 22:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spinningspark, that is nothing short of amazing. I must make a pilgrimage... I am figuratively at a loss for words. I am going to nominate that (with your permission) for DYK. Much thanks for bringing this to me. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you do go, try and get a better picture than this one. Be my guest with DYK. SpinningSpark 23:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hook ideas

... that a cow fell down a shaft at the Beans and Bacon mine nearly ninety years after its closure?

Thoughts (anyone)? --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
...that Beans and bacon has not been mined for nearly ninety years. SpinningSpark 00:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I like that one, do we still do funny ones for April 1? --kelapstick(bainuu) 00:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DYK still does April Fools. The procedure is to list it both at Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know as well as the main nomination page at Template talk:Did you know. We could also have,
...that beef found in beans and bacon led to an emergency operation.
By the way, it is currently about 80 words short of the DYK length requirement. SpinningSpark 08:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's still 1500 characters eh? its at about 1180 now I think. I will have a look this afternoon. --kelapstick(bainuu) 11:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]