Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashestoangels (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was delete |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:{{la|Ashestoangels}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashestoangels (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 24#{{anchorencode:Ashestoangels}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ashestoangels_(2nd_nomination) Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Ashestoangels}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashestoangels (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 24#{{anchorencode:Ashestoangels}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ashestoangels_(2nd_nomination) Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|Ashestoangels}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Ashestoangels}}) |
||
[[WP:BAND|Non-notable band]]. This band's article was deleted by AFD back in 2012, and although they appear to have released some albums since then, and gotten some press, it doesn't appear sufficient for notability. Most of the citations are to unreliable blog sites. The only references of any reliability are to some notice in ''[[Kerrang!]]'', but even these links are minimal and don't show the depth of coverage required. |
[[WP:BAND|Non-notable band]]. This band's article was deleted by AFD back in 2012, and although they appear to have released some albums since then, and gotten some press, it doesn't appear sufficient for notability. Most of the citations are to unreliable blog sites. The only references of any reliability are to some notice in ''[[Kerrang!]]'', but even these links are minimal and don't show the depth of coverage required. [[User:WikiDan61|<span style="color:green;">WikiDan61</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 11:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 16:44, 17 September 2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 06:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Ashestoangels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band. This band's article was deleted by AFD back in 2012, and although they appear to have released some albums since then, and gotten some press, it doesn't appear sufficient for notability. Most of the citations are to unreliable blog sites. The only references of any reliability are to some notice in Kerrang!, but even these links are minimal and don't show the depth of coverage required. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - agree there is not enough here to satisfy WP:BAND.--Gronk Oz (talk) 15:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete-Per nom. Wgolf (talk) 16:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete- fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG there are many, many low quality sources cited but none rise to the level of reliable sources. JbhTalk 00:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG. –Davey2010Talk 13:30, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.