Talk:Chukka boot: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:29, 17 May 2015

Fashion Unassessed Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Merging Veldskoen into Chukka Boots

Proposing the merger of Veldskoen into Chukka Boots as both articles are reasonably small, especially the former and as Chukkas were a re-naming of Veldskoene then it would make sense for them to be in the same article with this made clear. I would also propose Veldskoen having it own section as "Desert Boots" has to distinguish them from other Chukka Boots with their regional and historical differences. The Veldskoen article is also outside of the regular Wikipedia Fashion Project without its own section on footwear so I assume it sees page visits and rather than having two pages of what are essentially the same shoe being listed a merger would make the most sense in my opinion. -- Nick CB 01:29 BST 17/05/2015

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Proposing the merger of [[Veldskoen|Veldskoen]] into [[Chukka_boot|Chukka Boots]] as both articles are reasonably small, especially the former and as Chukkas were a re-naming of Veldskoene then it would make sense for them to be in the same article with this made clear.
 I would also propose Veldskoen having it own section as "Desert Boots" has to distinguish them from other Chukka Boots with their regional and historical differences.
-The Veldskoen article is also outside of the regular Wikipedia Fashion Project without its own section on footwear so I assume it sees page visits and rather than having two pages of what are essentially the same shoe being listed a merger would make the most sense in my opinion. - Nick CB 01:29 BST 17/05/2015
+The Veldskoen article is also outside of the regular Wikipedia Fashion Project without its own section on footwear so I assume it sees page visits and rather than having two pages of what are essentially the same shoe being listed a merger would make the most sense in my opinion. -- Nick CB 01:29 BST 17/05/2015