User talk:CopperPhantom: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Regarding your edits to the [[Arcadia]] article, '''see the [[WP:Preserve]] policy.''' You are not a complete [[WP:Newbie]], but you are acting as [[WP:Disruptively]] as one. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 22:47, 13 June 2015 (UTC) |
Regarding your edits to the [[Arcadia]] article, '''see the [[WP:Preserve]] policy.''' You are not a complete [[WP:Newbie]], but you are acting as [[WP:Disruptively]] as one. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 22:47, 13 June 2015 (UTC) |
||
I understand that the edits I made weren't constructive. It won't happen again. Thank you all. |
|||
Revision as of 22:59, 13 June 2015
June 2015
Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to David Abbott (magician)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 22:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arcadia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Serols (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your edits to the Arcadia article, see the WP:Preserve policy. You are not a complete WP:Newbie, but you are acting as WP:Disruptively as one. Flyer22 (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
I understand that the edits I made weren't constructive. It won't happen again. Thank you all.