Jump to content

Talk:Plücker embedding: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The section on Plucker relations makes no sense whatsoever. The notations are inconsistent and the equation meaningless. It should be rewritten properly.
The section on Plucker relations makes no sense whatsoever. The notations are inconsistent and the equation meaningless. It should be rewritten properly.
[[Special:Contributions/89.92.222.80|89.92.222.80]] ([[User talk:89.92.222.80|talk]]) 22:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)


The article [[Plucker_coordinates#Quadratic_relation]] gives an explicit description (with proof) of the quadratic relation between the coordinates for lines in projective 3-space. Does anyone know a good reference for the general case? It's a shame that now we don't even explicitly give those quadratic equations.
The article [[Plucker_coordinates#Quadratic_relation]] gives an explicit description (with proof) of the quadratic relation between the coordinates for lines in projective 3-space. Does anyone know a good reference for the general case? It's a shame that now we don't even explicitly give those quadratic equations.

Revision as of 22:33, 14 July 2015

The section on Plucker relations makes no sense whatsoever. The notations are inconsistent and the equation meaningless. It should be rewritten properly. 89.92.222.80 (talk) 22:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Plucker_coordinates#Quadratic_relation gives an explicit description (with proof) of the quadratic relation between the coordinates for lines in projective 3-space. Does anyone know a good reference for the general case? It's a shame that now we don't even explicitly give those quadratic equations. Evilbu (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added a tag requesting expert attention.Evilbu (talk) 06:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]