Talk:Plücker embedding: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The section on Plucker relations makes no sense whatsoever. The notations are inconsistent and the equation meaningless. It should be rewritten properly. |
The section on Plucker relations makes no sense whatsoever. The notations are inconsistent and the equation meaningless. It should be rewritten properly. |
||
[[Special:Contributions/89.92.222.80|89.92.222.80]] ([[User talk:89.92.222.80|talk]]) 22:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
The article [[Plucker_coordinates#Quadratic_relation]] gives an explicit description (with proof) of the quadratic relation between the coordinates for lines in projective 3-space. Does anyone know a good reference for the general case? It's a shame that now we don't even explicitly give those quadratic equations. |
The article [[Plucker_coordinates#Quadratic_relation]] gives an explicit description (with proof) of the quadratic relation between the coordinates for lines in projective 3-space. Does anyone know a good reference for the general case? It's a shame that now we don't even explicitly give those quadratic equations. |
Revision as of 22:33, 14 July 2015
The section on Plucker relations makes no sense whatsoever. The notations are inconsistent and the equation meaningless. It should be rewritten properly. 89.92.222.80 (talk) 22:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Plucker_coordinates#Quadratic_relation gives an explicit description (with proof) of the quadratic relation between the coordinates for lines in projective 3-space. Does anyone know a good reference for the general case? It's a shame that now we don't even explicitly give those quadratic equations. Evilbu (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- I added a tag requesting expert attention.Evilbu (talk) 06:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)