Jump to content

Talk:Sodium–sulfur battery: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Survey: Support
Femto (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Support''' per rationale. [[User:Dekimasu|Dekimasu]] 08:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per rationale. [[User:Dekimasu|Dekimasu]] 08:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per noination. [[User:Ratarsed|Ratarsed]] 12:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per noination. [[User:Ratarsed|Ratarsed]] 12:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. [[User:Femto|Femto]] 12:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


===Discussion===
===Discussion===

Revision as of 12:24, 7 August 2006

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.

Requested move

NaS batterySodium-sulfur battery – "Sodium-sulfur battery" appears to be used a little more frequently, if Google is any indication. Also, I think that it is best to go with the full name rather than an abbreviation, if the full name is in relatively common use. Finally, the new name would match the other battery article names. For example, the Lithium ion battery article is not named "Li-ion battery", Nickel metal hydride battery is not named "NiMH battery" and Nickel-cadmium battery is not named "NiCd battery" (they are all given as alternate names in the articles, of course). -- Kjkolb 09:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Discussion

Add any additional comments