User talk:Evelyn Lori: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:19, 27 September 2015

Your submission at Articles for creation: People Tech Group (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josve05a was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:People Tech Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 07:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Evelyn Lori, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 07:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: People Tech Group (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:People Tech Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam ^Sing! 10:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: People Tech Group (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:People Tech Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 <div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed!  Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Sam Sailor was:
-{{divbox|gray|<!-- no title -->|This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[WP:CORP|guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable organization]]|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
+{{divbox|gray|<!-- no title -->|This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[WP:CORP|guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:People Tech Group]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.<!-- end cv #ifeq -->
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 <div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:
-{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[WP:CORP|guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable organization]]|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
+{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[WP:CORP|guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
 {{clear}}
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:People Tech Group]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.