Jump to content

Talk:Kelli Ward: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
:I did not agree with the basis of the deletion by this user. The material removed seems legitimate, well sourced, and pertinent to the subject of the article. Before any further deletions are made, they should be discussed on the article's talk page and a consensus should be collectively achieved. [[User:Activist|Activist]] ([[User talk:Activist|talk]]) 02:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
:I did not agree with the basis of the deletion by this user. The material removed seems legitimate, well sourced, and pertinent to the subject of the article. Before any further deletions are made, they should be discussed on the article's talk page and a consensus should be collectively achieved. [[User:Activist|Activist]] ([[User talk:Activist|talk]]) 02:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Seems this is a recurring problem only now with [[User:Calibrador|Calibrador]] ([[User talk:Calibrador#top|talk]]). This senator has made many comments that support noted racists Cliven Bundy & Donald Sterling. Even if she is not a racist herself, as an elected official, its certainly notable to see where she stands on the issue if it isn't condoning the comments. Therefore its very much pertinent and relevant. Thank you [[Special:Contributions/100.14.57.197|100.14.57.197]] ([[User talk:100.14.57.197|talk]]) 17:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Seems this is a recurring problem only now with [[User:Calibrador|Calibrador]] ([[User talk:Calibrador#top|talk]]). This senator has made many comments that support noted racists Cliven Bundy & Donald Sterling. Even if she is not a racist herself, as an elected official, its certainly notable to see where she stands on the issue if it isn't condoning the comments. Therefore its very much pertinent and relevant. Thank you [[Special:Contributions/100.14.57.197|100.14.57.197]] ([[User talk:100.14.57.197|talk]]) 17:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
:The Sterling comments are not relevant other than a source existing. Not everything where a source is available is required to be included in the article. [[User:Calibrador|Calibrador]] ([[User talk:Calibrador|talk]]) 18:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:54, 2 December 2015

Reverted extensive deletion of material from article

I did not agree with the basis of the 548 character deletion by this user. The material removed seems legitimate, well sourced, and pertinent to the subject of the article. Apparently, it is the only edit that the anonymous user has ever made. The user's Internet Protocol address indicates that it was made from Glendale, AZ. The user has no entries on his or her TALK page. Before any further deletions are made, they should be discussed on the article's talk page and a consensus should be collectively achieved. Activist (talk) 00:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did not agree with the basis of the deletion by this user. The material removed seems legitimate, well sourced, and pertinent to the subject of the article. Before any further deletions are made, they should be discussed on the article's talk page and a consensus should be collectively achieved. Activist (talk) 02:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems this is a recurring problem only now with Calibrador (talk). This senator has made many comments that support noted racists Cliven Bundy & Donald Sterling. Even if she is not a racist herself, as an elected official, its certainly notable to see where she stands on the issue if it isn't condoning the comments. Therefore its very much pertinent and relevant. Thank you 100.14.57.197 (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Sterling comments are not relevant other than a source existing. Not everything where a source is available is required to be included in the article. Calibrador (talk) 18:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]