Talk:Martin Cahill: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:17, 30 December 2006

The IRA?Im almost certain he was killed by the INLA.Could someone clarify this?And im sure he was killed for drug dealing,not for invovlement with loyalistsDermo69

Paul Williams

There is a problem with this article, as it relies almost completely on the publications of a tabloid journalist from a tabloid newspaper. Paul Williams is not a credible source. His books are not referenced and are written as bestsellers. I know for a fact that his first book is full of some of the most basic inaccuracies concerning the subject and his life. The new theory outlined by User:Kingstowngalway is interesting, but I cannot help thinking that Williams has concocted this in an effort to make a few bob.--Damac 10:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you know of any other reliable sources, please introduce them into the article. Paul Williams meets WP guidelines for reliable sources, regardless of your personal opinion. One Night In Hackney 15:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 10:26, 13 August 2006 edit Damac (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 11,899 edits Paul Williams ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:17, 30 December 2006 edit undo One Night In Hackney (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 32,879 edits Response Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	There is a problem with this article, as it relies almost completely on the publications of a tabloid journalist from a tabloid newspaper. Paul Williams is not a credible source. His books are not referenced and are written as bestsellers. I know for a fact that his first book is full of some of the most basic inaccuracies concerning the subject and his life. The new theory outlined by [[User:Kingstowngalway]] is interesting, but I cannot help thinking that Williams has concocted this in an effort to make a few bob.--[[User:Damac\|Damac]] 10:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)		There is a problem with this article, as it relies almost completely on the publications of a tabloid journalist from a tabloid newspaper. Paul Williams is not a credible source. His books are not referenced and are written as bestsellers. I know for a fact that his first book is full of some of the most basic inaccuracies concerning the subject and his life. The new theory outlined by [[User:Kingstowngalway]] is interesting, but I cannot help thinking that Williams has concocted this in an effort to make a few bob.--[[User:Damac\|Damac]] 10:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
			:If you know of any other reliable sources, please introduce them into the article. Paul Williams meets WP guidelines for reliable sources, regardless of your personal opinion. [[User:One Night In Hackney\|One Night In Hackney]] 15:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)