Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nrwairport: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nrwairport is the older account
TheJack15 (talk | contribs)
Line 31: Line 31:


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

====<big>User Comments <!-- I AM ALLOWED TO MAKE MY OWN COMMENTS PER THE SPI POLICY --><big>

I tried to make a new account to get a fresh start on Wikipedia. I don't feel like I did anything wrong on my old account, and I also don't feel like I did anything wrong on my current account.

[[User:Tiggerjay|Tiggerjay]] ([[User talk:Tiggerjay|talk]]) has accused me of jumping in "to early" to Articles for Deletion, [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/usersearch.py?name=TheJack15&page=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion&server=enwiki&max= although as you can see, I have not edited AfD at all.]]

I also only made one edit to ANI, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=679838376&oldid=679838242#Block_request_for_140.200.7.58 the user I reported was blocked]

I understand the move request thing was partially my fault, but everything I did was in good faith, and I don't think I should be punished for productivity. Only 2 people left messages on my talk page about the Requested Moves but after that as was immediately accused of stuff that was irrelevant.






Revision as of 17:05, 30 December 2015


TheJack15

Please note that a case was originally opened under Nrwairport (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheJack15. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheJack15.


30 December 2015

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

This user had suspicious behavior jumping into the deep end of WP:RMCI and upon closer review learned that he was a confirmed by CU as a sock, and was blocked over at commons. Within the first 100 edits this user has jumped into WP:RM, WP:DR, WP:ANI, and WP:AfD. Requesting a block here for disruptive editing as well. Tiggerjay (talk) 01:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional concerning/suspicious actions by this editor:

  • 11 overall contribution was to create an ANI Report for an IP editor they never engaged with.
  • On 12th edited used Twinkle to warn an IP editor [1]
  • 23rd edit was to jump in an going WP:DR
  • He was warned about improperly closing a DR on his talk page which he subsequently blanked
  • Also blanked a warning about editing talk page comments.
  • And blanking a bot generated notice about removing AfD Templates.
  • Also removing a sock notice here.

These all seem to be very uncharacteristic actions of new users to the project, and combined with prior CU findings at commons appears to support that this user is still involved in SOCK activity and/or block evasion.

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Nrwairport is the older account. Was blocked on 18 August,[2] supposed sock account was created on 23 August.[3] Sam Sailor Talk! 11:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

====User Comments

I tried to make a new account to get a fresh start on Wikipedia. I don't feel like I did anything wrong on my old account, and I also don't feel like I did anything wrong on my current account.

Tiggerjay (talk) has accused me of jumping in "to early" to Articles for Deletion, although as you can see, I have not edited AfD at all.]

I also only made one edit to ANI, and the user I reported was blocked

I understand the move request thing was partially my fault, but everything I did was in good faith, and I don't think I should be punished for productivity. Only 2 people left messages on my talk page about the Requested Moves but after that as was immediately accused of stuff that was irrelevant.