Talk:Summed-area table: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:50, 15 February 2016

Computer science Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

This article needs a lot of clearing up. Although the formulas are correct its notation is unclear for people who don't know the Viola/Jones paper. What is A, B, C, D? A sum, area or a point? What is the function A(x)? What is i(x,y)? What is the one argumented function I(X) opposed to I(x, y)? All these are essential points missing. --85.177.99.146 (talk) 13:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The formula seems to be incorrect, the sum I(C)+I(A)-I(B)-I(D) calculates rectangle NOT including A, that is x0<(!)<=x1 and y0<=y<(!)y1.--46.223.253.194 (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the sum I(C)+I(A)-I(B)-I(D) calculates rectangle not including (A, B) and (A, D) edges, that is x0 < x and y0 < y. I tested that one in my c++ project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.124.228.2 (talk) 06:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Popularization

The statement "In computer vision it was first prominently used within the Viola–Jones object detection framework in 2001" is not correct. I recall publications by Lewis (and others e.g. Sun) in the 1990s that used this technique. Checking, I see two 1995 publications by Lewis (Fast Normalized Cross Correlation and Fast Template Matching) that have 970 and 600 citations respectively on google scholar. The computer vision conference they appeared in (Vision Interface) is obscure now, but with the publications themselves were well known. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.9.110.15 (talk • contribs)

See the textbook Concise Computer Vision, by Reinhard Klette, Springer, 2014. On p.52, a section The Introduction of Integral Images into Computer Vision: "Integral images have been introduced in the Computer Graphics literature in [F.C. Crow. Summed-area tables for texture mapping. Computer Graphics, vol. 18, pp. 207–212, 1984] and then popularized by [J.P. Lewis. Fast template matching. In Proc. Vision Interface, pp. 120–123, 1995] and [P. Viola and M. Jones. Robust real-time object detection. Int. J. Computer Vision, pp. 137–154, 2001] in the Computer Vision literature." The current wording of the page highlights only Viola&Jones while ignoring the earlier popularization by Lewis. I may try to edit the page 203.176.188.16 (talk) 05:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Frank Crow paper has over 1200 citations. Why isn't that considered the popularization of this idea? Dicklyon (talk) 06:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see, it's "in computer vision"; missed your point. Dicklyon (talk) 06:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:49, 15 February 2016 edit Dicklyon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 476,396 edits →Popularization ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:50, 15 February 2016 edit undo Dicklyon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 476,396 edits →Popularization Next edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:The Frank Crow paper has over 1200 citations. Why isn't that considered the popularization of this idea? [[User:Dicklyon\|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon\|talk]]) 06:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)		:The Frank Crow paper has over 1200 citations. Why isn't that considered the popularization of this idea? [[User:Dicklyon\|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon\|talk]]) 06:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
			:Oh, I see, it's "in computer vision"; missed your point. [[User:Dicklyon\|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon\|talk]]) 06:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)