Talk:Chocolate: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Signing comment by 109.10.162.136 - "" |
||
| Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
Thanks for your attention |
Thanks for your attention |
||
Britta Boutry <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/109.10.162.136|109.10.162.136]] ([[User talk:109.10.162.136|talk]]) 21:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Britta Boutry |
|||
Revision as of 21:03, 24 April 2016
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chocolate article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Chocolate was one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chocolate article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
Caption from image in Manufacturers section needs correcting
I seem to have noticed that the image in the "Manufacturers" section is depicting a box of Chocolate Hazelnuts from Sprüngli (not Lindt as incorrectly mentioned). If this could be corrected from:
Lindt chocolates in presentation box for the Switzerland Wiki Loves Monuments Awards Ceremony (2013)
to
Sprüngli chocolates in presentation box for the Switzerland Wiki Loves Monuments Awards Ceremony (2013)
Cheers.
Nutrition table -- why milk chocolate and not pure chocolate?
It seems kind of silly for the Nutrition section to have a table with the properties of "milk chocolate/candies" instead of baking chocolate, since that (for example) over-represents sugars and under-represents caffeine. If someone is wondering about their 50% chocolate, they can do the math. I'm inclined to update it with the USDA entry on baking chocolate, or perhaps someone else would like to. -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 02:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Milk chocolate may have been selected as the most commonly consumed retail chocolate. Should also consider dark chocolate with highest cacao content, 70-85% solids. --Zefr (talk) 03:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2016
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the following to the article on Chocolate in the section "Popular Culture" under the subsection "Religious and cultural links:"
"A 2015 study conducted at Simon Fraser University found that the most number of Instagram posts about chocolate occur on globally on Easter, with an increase of 30% when compared to Valentines Day, for the one year period between October 2014 and October 2015."
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Saifcharaniya (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Saif Charaniya, "Analysis of Instagram Posts About #Chocolate using Big Data Tools." http://www.cs.sfu.ca/people/GradStudents/saifc/personal/webfront/index.html, 2015.
- ^ Saif Charaniya, "Analysis of Instagram Posts on Chocolate." https://public.tableau.com/profile/saif.charaniya#!/vizhome/ValentinesDayInstagramPosts/Story1, 2015.
- ^ Dumas, J. (2016 February 29). SFU student tracks chocolate with Instagram data. The Peak. retrieved from http://www.the-peak.ca/2016/02/sfu-student-tracks-chocolate-with-instagram-data.
- ^ Simon Fraser University. (2016 February 13). SFU big data student’s Instagram research takes a bite out of #chocolate. Faculty of Applied Sciences News and Outreach. retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/fas/news-and-outreach/years/20151/big-data-students-instagram-research-takes-a-bite-out-of--chocol1.html
- ^ Fletcher, T. (2016 February 15). SFU student using big data to find world's top chocolate-loving cities. Metro Vancouver News. retrieved from http://www.metronews.ca/news/vancouver/2016/02/15/sfu-student-using-big-data-to-find-chocolate-loving-cities.html
- No, that is unnecessary trivia and spam; WP:IINFO. --Zefr (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to suggest to improve by updating the section 4.1 on cacao varieties. Up to 2008, the three varieties were major (Criollo, Forastero, Trinitario). But since 2008, there is a new classification, please check on the french wiki : La nouvelle classification de 2008, basée sur des critères morpho-géographiques et génomiques propose dix groupes retenus et nommés en fonction de leur origine géographique ou du nom du cultivar traditionnel : Amelonado, Cacao Criollo, Nacional, Contamana, Curaray, Cacao guiana, Iquitos, Marañon, Nanay, Purús5; Et la Le Cupuaçu espèce proche. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A8ve_de_cacao
Thanks for your attention Britta Boutry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.10.162.136 (talk) 21:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)