User talk:Rjd0060

Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page.
I will usually reply to messages left here on this page so check back for a response.

---

Archives /Archives for a full archive

Image

Hi, I actually asked in the teahouse where I can go and I was sent to the Admin OTRS page. It has taken 10 months (very recent 7 April 2016) for me to locate the photographer of the image that was originally installed 22 May 2015 and then deleted. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gary_Kendall.jpg) I do not know if there is enough permission here. Three tickets had to be created to hopefully prove permission. I do not know if the form has been sent in by the photographer yet, sometimes I am not notified they have sent them in. Please let me know, I sure would like this settled and over. I also understand that you are back logged in otrs at the moment, I do understand if this cannot be dealt with at present. Thank you T Heart (talk) 13:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Ticket#: 2016041210013061, Ticket#: 2016041010008071, Ticket#: 2016041010008098

Hello Imasku. The tickets have been recevived and are awaiting processing. You are free to follow up at commons:COM:OTRS/N in the meantime. Note that it could take some time before the permissions are processed and the images tagged. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. T Heart (talk) 23:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I just heard from the photographer and he has sent me the ticket number wikipedia sent him. He was confused by the email which is why he did not contact me, he thought permissions was sending him something else so he waited. Please delete the above ticket numbers, this will be the only one needed, as I really do not wish you or the volunteers wasting time when there is such a back log: Ticket#: 2016040810015423. I am so glad this 10 month search will finally come to an end. Thanks much, appreciated. T Heart (talk) 21:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

I have merged all the tickets together. The volunteer who processes it should be able to understand the situation. Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:22, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank youT Heart (talk) 19:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Bruce Maiman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruce Maiman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Maiman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Baboor Kamme

Hi. I saw you deleted the page for Baboor Kamme and mentioned the reason that it has been unsourced for years. I belong to the community and the Wikipedia page that was deleted was well-documented. For the proof of the existence of the community, you can refer to List of Brahmin Communities : Brahma Samaj . You can also find some relevant stuff in web searches, such as, Open Access Articles and IndiaDivine.org, but I don't know whether you expect further citations to review the decision. If the deletion can be reversed, does one need to do some major research to cite further credible sources which can be considered acceptable? Krishna Ramachandra 04:30, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Be..anyone 💩 02:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Episerver Article Deletion

Hello - The Episerver (EPiServer) -- https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=EPiServer&action=edit&redlink=1 -- page was deleted by you in October 2015. The reason is -- "Expired PROD, concern was: No evidence of notability. Only one reference that might possibly be considered independent, and that is no more than an announcement of a business deal."

I am hoping to have this page restored. There is evidence of notability as one of the top web content management systems and ecommerce platforms, and you will see independent references below, including other Wikipedia articles. I work for Episerver and I am happy to update the article with relevant content and proper citations. Is there any way you can reinstate the article or make a recommendation on how I can get it undeleted? I'd appreciate any help you can offer. Thank you in advance. References on the Internet

BRIEF-Clavister announces a deployment of W50 firewalls by Episerve

8 Benefits of Multi-Channel Digital Marketing

An Interview with James Stout, Senior Manager, Technology and Developer Evangelist, Episerver

An epic Episerver Ascend 2015 customer conference

Episerver Releases Digital Experience Cloud Fall 15

References within Wikipedia

Ektron

Web Technology Group

Web content management system

Undelete Choice Based Credit System Article

I was not active on wikipedia and therefore could not oppose the PROD and it was expired when I returned. I have a lot of evidence to prove it's notability and it's worth of inclusion on Wikipedia. Thanks Ryan Assefme (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)