Talk:Hans Henning Atrott: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:48, 7 July 2016

THE GERMAN EVALUATION

I do not mind putting the text of the controversy to the archive. In only object that within a dispute the one party "evaluates" the conflict to the very favor of itself. For example, it is an unbiased and useful information that the Germans - already for more than a decade wanting to bring the English version of this article in a strict line with their defamatory one in their edition - are also strongly contested in their country. This is about a fact! In addition, it is no insult to inform the readers whether the one that cannot be wrong is a PhD or a cigarettes seller. This is also no insult but a fact that can be verified. Everybody has to prove its competence. Schinkelburg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schinkelburg (talk • contribs) 07:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

THE BOSSY GERMANS

Hans Atrott rightly claims having become a "German" by "accident" since without the Germans' annexation of Lithuania Minor in 1938 he wouldn't be one. By the way, the Germans did not acknowledge people from this part of Lithuanian as German citizens, after WWII (from 1945 until 1950). Here, this sort of individuals (as "co-workers of German Wikipedia") want to cover the anyway never ending shame of their country that a contemporary famous one exiled from their country. The average German is used to imposing his will on others. He fools himself being the biggest, strongest, smartest and best. It is not the problem, whether the Germans are still Nazis, today, but that the Nazis were genuine Germans...! The German screwballs rather should be banned from conquering "the world." A reader from Poland 5.172.188.58 (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''THE GERMAN EVALUATION'''
 I do not mind putting the text of the controversy to the archive. In only object that within a dispute the one party "evaluates" the conflict to the very favor of itself. For example, it is an unbiased and useful information that the Germans - already for more than a decade wanting to bring the English version of this article in a strict line with their defamatory one in their edition - are also strongly contested in their country. This is about a fact!  In addition, it is no insult to inform the readers whether the one that cannot be wrong is a PhD or a cigarettes seller. This is also no insult but a fact that can be verified. Everybody has to prove its competence.
 Schinkelburg  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Schinkelburg|Schinkelburg]] ([[User talk:Schinkelburg|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Schinkelburg|contribs]]) 07:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+==THE BOSSY GERMANS==
+Hans Atrott rightly claims having become a "German" by "accident" since without the Germans' annexation of Lithuania Minor in 1938 he wouldn't be one. By the way, the Germans did not acknowledge people from this part of Lithuanian as German citizens, after WWII (from 1945 until 1950). Here, this sort of individuals (as "co-workers of German Wikipedia")  want to cover the anyway never ending shame of their country that a contemporary famous one exiled from their country.  The average German is used to imposing his will on others. He fools himself being the biggest, strongest, smartest and best.   It is not the problem, whether the Germans are still Nazis, today, but that the Nazis were genuine Germans...! The German screwballs rather should be banned from conquering "the world." A reader from Poland [[Special:Contributions/5.172.188.58|5.172.188.58]] ([[User talk:5.172.188.58|talk]]) 22:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)