Jump to content

Binet–Cauchy identity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bender the Bot (talk | contribs)
m top: http→https for Google Books and Google News using AWB
The Binet–Cauchy identity and exterior algebra: This part does not depend upon the vectors being of length 1. Formatting.
Line 19: Line 19:


==The Binet–Cauchy identity and exterior algebra==
==The Binet–Cauchy identity and exterior algebra==
When ''n'' = 3 the first and second terms on the right hand side become the squared magnitudes of [[Dot product|dot]] and [[cross product]]s respectively; in ''n'' dimensions these become the magnitudes of the dot and [[wedge product]]s. We may write it
When {{math|1=''n'' = 3}}, the first and second terms on the right hand side become the squared magnitudes of [[Dot product|dot]] and [[cross product]]s respectively; in {{math|''n''}} dimensions these become the magnitudes of the dot and [[wedge product]]s. We may write it


:<math>(a \cdot c)(b \cdot d) = (a \cdot d)(b \cdot c) + (a \wedge b) \cdot (c \wedge d)\,</math>
:<math>(a \cdot c)(b \cdot d) = (a \cdot d)(b \cdot c) + (a \wedge b) \cdot (c \wedge d)\,</math>


where '''a''', '''b''', '''c''', and '''d''' are vectors. It may also be written as a formula giving the dot product of two wedge products, as
where {{math|'''a'''}}, {{math|'''b'''}}, {{math|'''c'''}}, and {{math|'''d'''}} are vectors. It may also be written as a formula giving the dot product of two wedge products, as


:<math>(a \wedge b) \cdot (c \wedge d) = (a \cdot c)(b \cdot d) - (a \cdot d)(b \cdot c).\,</math>
:<math>(a \wedge b) \cdot (c \wedge d) = (a \cdot c)(b \cdot d) - (a \cdot d)(b \cdot c).\,</math>
In the special case of unit vectors ''a=c'' and ''b=d'', the formula yields
In the special case {{math|1='''a''' = '''c'''}} and {{math|1='''b''' = '''d'''}}, the formula yields
:<math>|a \wedge b|^2 = |a|^2|b|^2 - |a \cdot b|^2. \,</math>
:<math>|a \wedge b|^2 = |a|^2|b|^2 - |a \cdot b|^2. \,</math>


When both vectors are unit vectors, we obtain the usual relation
When both {{math|'''a'''}} and {{math|'''b'''}} are unit vectors, we obtain the usual relation
:<math>1= \cos^2(\phi)+\sin^2(\phi)</math>
:<math>1= \cos^2 \phi + \sin^2 \phi</math>
where φ is the angle between the vectors.
where {{math|''φ''}} is the angle between the vectors.


==Proof==
==Proof==

Revision as of 15:57, 20 March 2017

In algebra, the Binet–Cauchy identity, named after Jacques Philippe Marie Binet and Augustin-Louis Cauchy, states that [1]

for every choice of real or complex numbers (or more generally, elements of a commutative ring). Setting ai = ci and bj = dj, it gives the Lagrange's identity, which is a stronger version of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for the Euclidean space .

The Binet–Cauchy identity and exterior algebra

When n = 3, the first and second terms on the right hand side become the squared magnitudes of dot and cross products respectively; in n dimensions these become the magnitudes of the dot and wedge products. We may write it

where a, b, c, and d are vectors. It may also be written as a formula giving the dot product of two wedge products, as

In the special case a = c and b = d, the formula yields

When both a and b are unit vectors, we obtain the usual relation

where φ is the angle between the vectors.

Proof

Expanding the last term,

where the second and fourth terms are the same and artificially added to complete the sums as follows:

This completes the proof after factoring out the terms indexed by i.

Generalization

A general form, also known as the Cauchy–Binet formula, states the following: Suppose A is an m×n matrix and B is an n×m matrix. If S is a subset of {1, ..., n} with m elements, we write AS for the m×m matrix whose columns are those columns of A that have indices from S. Similarly, we write BS for the m×m matrix whose rows are those rows of B that have indices from S. Then the determinant of the matrix product of A and B satisfies the identity

where the sum extends over all possible subsets S of {1, ..., n} with m elements.

We get the original identity as special case by setting

In-line notes and references

  1. ^ Eric W. Weisstein (2003). "Binet-Cauchy identity". CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics (2nd ed.). CRC Press. p. 228. ISBN 1-58488-347-2.