Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ERHaxhiu: Difference between revisions
→20 November 2016: move incomprehensible unsigned comment to correct section |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Both editors edit the same articles in the same way and after watching the reported user a while I found a report necessary. For example if you compare the contributions, first you see that both editor almost always calls everything for "minor edit" (just like previous blocked sock [[User:EnZoo]]). As comparison, both the sockmaster and the reported editor has been making the same disruptive infobox change ([https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_national_football_team&diff=next&oldid=733991364 diff ERHaxhiu], [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_national_football_team&diff=749273347&oldid=749171358 diff ALBUD]) adding matches that dont belong (discussed at article talkpage). <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">[[User:Qed237|<b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>]] [[User talk:Qed237|<b style="color:green">(talk)</b>]]</i> 11:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC) |
Both editors edit the same articles in the same way and after watching the reported user a while I found a report necessary. For example if you compare the contributions, first you see that both editor almost always calls everything for "minor edit" (just like previous blocked sock [[User:EnZoo]]). As comparison, both the sockmaster and the reported editor has been making the same disruptive infobox change ([https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_national_football_team&diff=next&oldid=733991364 diff ERHaxhiu], [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_national_football_team&diff=749273347&oldid=749171358 diff ALBUD]) adding matches that dont belong (discussed at article talkpage). <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">[[User:Qed237|<b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>]] [[User talk:Qed237|<b style="color:green">(talk)</b>]]</i> 11:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
| ⚫ | |||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
Revision as of 19:26, 20 November 2016
ERHaxhiu
ERHaxhiu (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ERHaxhiu/Archive.
20 November 2016
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- ALBUD (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Both editors edit the same articles in the same way and after watching the reported user a while I found a report necessary. For example if you compare the contributions, first you see that both editor almost always calls everything for "minor edit" (just like previous blocked sock User:EnZoo). As comparison, both the sockmaster and the reported editor has been making the same disruptive infobox change (diff ERHaxhiu, diff ALBUD) adding matches that dont belong (discussed at article talkpage). Qed237 (talk) 11:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@Qed237: You apologized for the mistake that I made, never it will not be repeated in mistake