Talk:Reticulocyte production index: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:29, 30 December 2016

Medicine Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disputed

The Calculation and Interpretation sections are wrong and inconsistent. See the Wrong formula comment. GrantZ (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong formula

The first formula given here for corrected retic count is wrong. It should not be divided by 2. (See Ref 1) (See Ref 2)—— Saurabh P. (talk) 06:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The interpretation section seems to be inconsistent with the calculation. It only mentions RI while the calculation above determines the RPI. The 0.5% to 2.5% range also seems dubious. GrantZ (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WPMED|class=Start|importance=Low}}
+== Disputed ==
+The Calculation and Interpretation sections are wrong and inconsistent. See the Wrong formula comment. [[User:GrantZ|GrantZ]] ([[User talk:GrantZ|talk]]) 15:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 == Wrong formula ==