Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 13: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 16: Line 16:
* {{Tfd links|StarsUnfolded}}
* {{Tfd links|StarsUnfolded}}
Unnecessary template based on a non-notable website ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarsUnfolded]]). I don't see any use of this template. [[User:GSS-1987|<span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS</span>]] ([[User talk:GSS-1987|talk]]<small>|[[Special:Contributions/GSS-1987|c]]|[[Special:EmailUser/GSS-1987|em]]</small>) 17:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Unnecessary template based on a non-notable website ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarsUnfolded]]). I don't see any use of this template. [[User:GSS-1987|<span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS</span>]] ([[User talk:GSS-1987|talk]]<small>|[[Special:Contributions/GSS-1987|c]]|[[Special:EmailUser/GSS-1987|em]]</small>) 17:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
* '''delete''', not needed. [[User:Frietjes|Frietjes]] ([[User talk:Frietjes|talk]]) 17:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

==== [[Template:God of War chronology]] ====
==== [[Template:God of War chronology]] ====
* {{Tfd links|God of War chronology}}
* {{Tfd links|God of War chronology}}

Revision as of 17:58, 16 March 2017

March 13

Unnecessary template based on a non-notable website (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarsUnfolded). I don't see any use of this template. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Navigation dealt with at Template:God of War series Rob Sinden (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just wrote an article about a chemist who had received this award, and when I noticed it had its own template, I went ahead and added it in. However, I hadn't heard of the award and decided to look a bit further. The template originally linked its title to the very notable, national-reach American Chemical Society, whose awards are generally very prestigious, but on investigation the award is actually given by a smaller society local to Michigan. (See here and here.) A 2011 CfD deleted a corresponding category and recognized that this is a "borderline non-notable" award, but I think it's not even that. With no disrespect meant to the recipients - most of whom would be easy WP:PROF passes, despite the redlink forest - I don't think this subject needs a navbox. Opabinia regalis (talk) 08:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]