Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther Tosin Adekeye: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Versace1608 (talk | contribs) →Esther Tosin Adekeye: delete |
Versace1608 (talk | contribs) cant recommend a course of action twice |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<font color="#1009bf">[[User:J947|J]]</font><font color="#137412">[[User talk:J947|947]]</font>''' 00:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Esther Tosin Adekeye]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<font color="#1009bf">[[User:J947|J]]</font><font color="#137412">[[User talk:J947|947]]</font>''' 00:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Esther Tosin Adekeye]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
* '''Keep''' Some of the sources in the Article are from the leading and most trusted news platform in the country. Passes [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:GNG]][[User:Tobi19|Tobi19]] ([[User talk:Tobi19|talk]]) 09:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' per Darreg. The subject has not been discussed in significant detail. [[User:Versace1608|<span style='color:white;background-color: blue;'><b> Versace'''1608''' </b></span>]] [[User Talk:Versace1608|<sup><span style='color:white;background-color:red;'><b>''Wanna Talk''?</b></span></sup>]] 22:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per Darreg. The subject has not been discussed in significant detail. [[User:Versace1608|<span style='color:white;background-color: blue;'><b> Versace'''1608''' </b></span>]] [[User Talk:Versace1608|<sup><span style='color:white;background-color:red;'><b>''Wanna Talk''?</b></span></sup>]] 22:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:09, 23 March 2017
- Esther Tosin Adekeye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The Biography of this person has questionable notability. TopCipher 07:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Article meets WP:GNG requirements and also the sources to the person in question are properly cited.Tobi19 (talk) 11:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:RS as no sources were found on GNEWS. Zazzysa (talk) 14:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Weak Delete: Trivial mentions in reliable sources, promotional interviews in semi-reliable sources plus the possibility of COI makes me tend towards deletion. Unilag F.M isn't a major radio station, so being an OAP for them counts for nothing. But there are reliable sources on her, not just significant enough for inclusion IMO. Darreg (talk) 21:43, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 00:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 00:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per Darreg. The subject has not been discussed in significant detail. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 22:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)