Wikipedia talk:Dispute resolution

NOTE: This is not the place to post notices of disputes, questions about particular articles, or requests for assistance. Posts that are not a discussion of the project page Wikipedia:Dispute resolution will simply be ignored or collapsed. Please follow Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

---

What to do with Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard?

The Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard may have some volunteers, but more volunteers are needed. Some cases are left without a mediator to answer them. I tried addressing this at WT:NOR, WT:NORN, and WP:VPP. However, no one responded. I've not yet addressed this at WP:AN because I'm unsure whether the issue affects administrators. What to do about the Noticeboard, mentioned by this policy? --George Ho (talk) 06:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Personal attack by another editor

See "NOTE" at top of this page. Either take your inquiry to an adminstrator or file a complaint at ANI. - TransporterMan (TALK) 23:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

At the suggestion of User:CapnZapp, who had advised User:Pyxis Solitary and me to avoid each other, I am bringing this issue here. While Pyxis Solitary isn't using my name, the note added to Pyxis Solitary's user page on Feb. 4 — just two days after CapnZapp and others advised us to avoid each other — is clearly referring to things on my user page, such as my edit count and the accolades I've gratefully accepted from the many fellow editors with whom I collegially work. I believe it's wrong not only to make a personal attack like that but also to be "clever" and attack another editor using insinuation. I ask for help or at least advice: Is it OK for that editor to do this? --Tenebrae (talk) 21:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

About Scythians topic

Hello. This is about a dispute between me and one of your users. Although I changed my latest comment according to his notice and your regulations, and posted a new and decent one under the topic Scythians, your biased user Future Perfect at Sunrise blocked me subjectively as probably he didn’t want to hear the new argument about them and Sarmatians. This is ridiculous and must be unacceptable by Wikipedia, if you are really open to everybody and respect new findings and results. There I just wrote about the outcome of latest research by Turkish academics and scholars as people are now researching and learning and sharing the new findings as well criticizing the popular old-fashioned history.

Mind you, I am an academician and I believe I should be able to post messages about the works of mine and other scholars in this free world and particularly in this free platform, don't you think so? After all I have come across with many bad comments about Turks in Wikipedia pages under such topics as Armenian genocide, so obviously some people are quite free to post comments about Turks. How about us?? Why can't I post a decent argument about the origin of Scythians and Sarmatians according to latest research? Did you think that blocking people and erasing comments will help prevent the new ideas from spreading?

I am sorry but from now on I will start thinking that Wikipedia is a sided platform full of cliche and prejudice unless you take an action towards this wrong behaviour. If you don't, I will be sharing this with every single person and institution I am in touch with in Turkey and abroad while I will always stay away from Wikipedia.

Thank you . Buusra — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.113.8.2 (talk) 08:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)