Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ActoGeniX: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:35, 25 April 2017

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lactococcus lactis. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ActoGeniX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for pharmaceutical company. Multiple use of trademarks. No approved products. Various medical claims are made based upon individual journalarticles, that do not meet MEDRS standards. DGG ( talk ) 08:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

- - I have bundled ActoBiotics with this. Created by same editor, equally as non-notable and promotional. Jytdog (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that on 17 April 2017 ActoBiotics was added to this nomination page and the AfD template was added atop that article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

note that this company doesn't exist anymore - nobody cared after the spammer did their thing. was acquired in 2015 Jytdog (talk) 05:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Lactococcus lactis Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

yes, that makes sense to me also. DGG ( talk ) 20:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This proposed therapeutic agent is only in phase 1 trials in humans. Not worthy of an article. May not pan out. If it does, then later a mention in a more general article on oral bio-pharmaceuticals in general or the Lactococcus article might be appropriate. JuanTamad (talk) 04:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''redirect to [[Lactococcus lactis]]'''.  – '''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray;text-shadow:gray .2em .18em .12em">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 02:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 ===[[:ActoGeniX]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|ActoGeniX}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ActoGeniX|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 17#{{anchorencode:ActoGeniX}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ActoGeniX Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 19: / Line 26: @@
 ::yes, that makes sense to me also. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 20:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 ::: This proposed therapeutic agent is only in phase 1 trials in humans. Not worthy of an article. May not pan out. If it does, then later a mention in a more general article on oral bio-pharmaceuticals in general or the Lactococcus article  might be appropriate. [[User:Jtamad|JuanTamad]] ([[User talk:Jtamad|talk]]) 04:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>