Jump to content

User talk:Dammitkevin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message
Line 96: Line 96:
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Are you aware of Sodium Ion batteries? How is adding entry about anode free architectures promotional. It has a valid reference in a high impact peer reviewed journal. Are you familiar with the literature at all? [[User:Nitin-Nitin|Nitin-Nitin]] ([[User talk:Nitin-Nitin|talk]]) 19:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Are you aware of Sodium Ion batteries? How is adding entry about anode free architectures promotional. It has a valid reference in a high impact peer reviewed journal. Are you familiar with the literature at all? [[User:Nitin-Nitin|Nitin-Nitin]] ([[User talk:Nitin-Nitin|talk]]) 19:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
|}
|}

:You are solely adding papers authored by the same person to articles and that is reference spam. You can remove the warnings from your talk page but continuing to make the same edits will only lead to more warnings. [[User:Dammitkevin|Dammitkevin]] ([[User talk:Dammitkevin#top|talk]]) 19:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:32, 11 July 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Dammitkevin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sanchi. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 18:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kaliachak Riots

Check the citations, they are merely junk links with no real citation existing. Rajat.kalia (talk) 14:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The citations include The Indian Express, The Telegraph, and India Today. They aren't junk links. Dammitkevin (talk) 14:18, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maggie's Dream

Sad to see that someone, Dammitkevin, went to spoil Maggie's Dream page. You could as well take it off for good, there's nothing interesting left. And if you only had photo of them, you could add it but, you don't have, no can do. I have photos but won't share them with an arrogant editor. It's insulting to contest someone's knowledge about the band and add abridged information as if it were global information. I remember well enough those days when Maggie's Dream were touring in Europe, I was there. I also have known bassist Lonnie Hillyer since 1992. Well, if this is US style of editing or better killing pages, let it be. I don't want to be part of this. You really need orientate youself, not just cut information out and add few newspaper links as if it's all there was. Terence Trent D'arby and Living Colour were not mentioned with Maggie's Dream, not globally, only Lenny Kravitz was but, he was a friend with these New Yorkers and actually did singing job in their 2 first demos before they found Robi Rosa, as his name was in early 90's, and signing with Capitol. If one people gives opinion that MD sounds like Living Colour or Terence Trent D'arby, it doesn't mean that it was true. And you blamed me for adding opinions. I added facts but you cut them all off. Not only my editing but also original article. Who has that kind of power in here? This used to be a nice place once. You can have it, I'm done. Aniakallio (talk) 17:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've never edited the Maggie's Dream page and all I did was add references and remove information literally labeled "rumor". If you don't agree with verifiability than Wikipedia might not be for you. Dammitkevin (talk) 17:19, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalism, the website I post is an source. Why is the link below is a spam? SKULLOSSUS (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are adding the same geocities link to articles which is spamming and you are using it to source original research. Dammitkevin (talk) 17:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Geocites is not an object to spam. It's allowed at Russian Wikipedia. Lolicon is prohibited in Russia and the warning at the site is a perfect evidence. SKULLOSSUS (talk) 18:05, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Geocities is not inherently spam but you are adding the same geocities website to articles and that is all you are doing. That is spam. It is not a reliable source so if you want to add that information you need a better source. Dammitkevin (talk) 18:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'll inform admins about this incident NOW!! SKULLOSSUS (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Let them know you are spamming unreliable sources into articles. Dammitkevin (talk) 18:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong. They just check it. SKULLOSSUS (talk) 18:10, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you are going to delete link at Russian article, you'll be instantly blocked. SKULLOSSUS (talk) 18:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for polypyrrole help

Not sure where you came from, but thanks for stopping a self-promoting editor from distorting the polypyrrole article. Only a few regular editors take time to do battle with self-absorbed editors determined to foist their narrow publications on Wikipedia. Efforts like yours strengthen this medium. --Smokefoot (talk) 03:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the compliments. Kindness like yours strengthens this medium too. Dammitkevin (talk) 09:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manjushri

Technically you have broken WP:3RR at Manjushri. Take care! I'll take a closer look. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The other editor keeps deleting sources without reason or discussion. Dammitkevin (talk) 12:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I noticed. Nevertheless, let it rest for today. The article is also on other editor's watchlists. And/or start a discussion at the talkpage! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Thanks. Dammitkevin (talk) 13:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crazymonster

Hi, Dammitkevin. I saw you revert all my added links from Popnable. I do not understand why you assume it's a spam. Popnable is reliable source. Singers (very popular) from all around the world cite the popnable charts in their official profiles. Here is examples that I know: https://facebook.com/papaijociofficial/posts/1491244094284122 (Pápai Joci, Hungary, ESC 2017) https://www.facebook.com/mhamdsalem/posts/1327506270652639 (Mohamed Alsalim, Iraq) https://www.facebook.com/MzunguKichaa/posts/10154154526821189 (Denmark) https://twitter.com/bradi03/status/817019672411389952 (Finland) https://www.facebook.com/AmineAminuxofficiel/photos/a.1490642284595574.1073741829.1487392494920553/1629086207417847 (Morocco)

Also, I have seen citing from Bulgaria, Serbia, Latvia, Russia, UK and many others.

Perhaps, I did not mention the source as well as, so could you please help me to understand how to cite correctly. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazymonster (talkcontribs) 12:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much every edit you have made has been to add that website into articles. It is not a reliable source and your actions are spamming. Dammitkevin (talk) 13:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dammitkevin, you have undone an edit to the page that consisted of changing 3 bullet points (vague wax melting points) to a 20 point chart with specific wax melting points. Each header was also linked to the relevant wiki page. A source was cited. As this is specific scientific information, I am unclear on how this constitutes a violation for promotion? - Addled User (talk) 13:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the Temperature Play page, the old information was vague, overly personal and unsafe information. Many of the edits were done to make a meandering and vague page more scientific and specific to use. -Addled User (talk) 13:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your source was a self-published book from Lulu (company) and you were adding it to multiple articles. It isn't a reliable source and your edit even stated "This article derives heavily from the book "Playing With Fire" by Henry (Lulu press, 2013)" You cannot take text from a book and add it to an article. Dammitkevin (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have left a warning on my talk page regarding nominating Flight 19 for speedy deletion. I am not even sure I have ever edited this page, nor does it appear to have been speedied (based on a cursory glance), at least not any time recently. You may want to adjust some settings if you are using a script, or maybe just watch what you are doing a little closer. Thanks! OrbitHawk (talk) 23:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What happened was you created a redirect (Lost Squadron) to Flight 19 and then X62225 then made it into a hoax article. It was the latter hoax article I was tagging for deletion but since you created the initial redirect the script sent the notice to you. I'm sorry about the confusion. Dammitkevin (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Are you aware of Sodium Ion batteries? How is adding entry about anode free architectures promotional. It has a valid reference in a high impact peer reviewed journal. Are you familiar with the literature at all? Nitin-Nitin (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are solely adding papers authored by the same person to articles and that is reference spam. You can remove the warnings from your talk page but continuing to make the same edits will only lead to more warnings. Dammitkevin (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]