User talk:TheNeerajGoswami

Welcome!

Hello, TheNeerajGoswami, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Hello, I'm Mean as custard. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 08:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Mean as custard (talk) 08:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

• traininfo.in: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://notspam.traininfo.in

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 08:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19349 was submitted on Sep 27, 2017 04:59:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's all by mistake, I didn't read rules of editing any articles and done it by mistake

Decline reason:

This was not an accident. You were warned and continued spamming Wikipedia. And you've still provided no reason to believe you understand what you did. Yamla (talk) 10:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Sir, Trust me I didn't even checked any notifications or messeges that sent by Wikipedia. Because I don't know that I got notification from Wikipedia cause I did't have much knowledge about terms of Wikipedia, after I get blocked by wikipedia then I read everything and realized that I did it is totally wrong :( I'm assuring you that I won't do that again in future TheNeerajGoswami (talk) 13:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia; you are therefore expected to respond to (or at least read) messages sent by other editors. Given that new messages are clearly highlighted in the interface, failing to read them would require wilfully ignoring the (very obvious!) new message alerts. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was totally new at this interface, and didn't knew that I got any notification from wikipedia. therefore, I done that editing and was *not aware of any notificaion that I got from wikipedia, It's totally done by mistake TheNeerajGoswami (talk) 06:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have not convinced me you have read and understood WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 12:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I read everything and understand, that has been done by mistake, I won't repeat that again in future

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I read everything and understand, that has been done by mistake, I won't repeat that again in future |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I read everything and understand, that has been done by mistake, I won't repeat that again in future |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I read everything and understand, that has been done by mistake, I won't repeat that again in future |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• A check of a substantial sample of your edits suggests that 100% of your editing has consisted of adding spam links to one web site and removing links to other web sites. Since you won't again make what you call the "mistake" of doing those things again, what kinds of editing will you be doing? Clearly there is no point in unblocking you unless you are going to do some sort of constructive editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry for my editing

You need to actually answer JamesBWatson's question - what kinds of editing will you be doing? (And please don't keep adding new unblock requests when you already have one open - only a plain text answer is needed.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)