Jump to content

Talk:Josh Peck: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 185: Line 185:
== Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2017 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2017 ==


{{edit semi-protected|Josh Peck|answered=no}}
{{edit semi-protected|Josh Peck|answered=yes}}
Most of his occupations are in cap leaders and should all be lower case, except for "Actor" and "Youtube personality". Also, what is "Viner" I don't think there's no such occupation called a "Viner", that's the only thing that should be removed from his occupation section. Because I looked it up and there's no such occupation called a "Viner". [[Special:Contributions/174.192.23.120|174.192.23.120]] ([[User talk:174.192.23.120|talk]]) 12:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Most of his occupations are in cap leaders and should all be lower case, except for "Actor" and "Youtube personality". Also, what is "Viner" I don't think there's no such occupation called a "Viner", that's the only thing that should be removed from his occupation section. Because I looked it up and there's no such occupation called a "Viner". [[Special:Contributions/174.192.23.120|174.192.23.120]] ([[User talk:174.192.23.120|talk]]) 12:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
:[[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Stickee|Stickee]] <small>[[User talk:Stickee|(talk)]]</small> 01:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:40, 11 October 2017


Before and After photographs

This article should have two photographs - one before, as overweight funny sidekick, and one after, as handsome star. Das Baz, aka Erudil 17:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weight loss

Can anyone tell me anything about his dramatic weght loss?--The Republican 01:08, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, yeah I notice that to it is a very big weight loss, I haven't seen their show in a while so when I saw a new ep. I didn't even think it was the guy, at first I thought Drake was dressing up as Josh for some reason.--Danny—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.231.19 (talk • contribs) 16:45, 27 September, 2006
Yeah, I noticed that too, that happens to fat children sometimes, they get older, more handsome, more masculine/feminine etc. etc..—Preceding unsigned comment added by FlareNUKE (talk • contribs) 13:08, 19 October, 2006
Theres no way he "worked with a physical trainer". It looks like he got some type of surgery.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Moneymike (talk • contribs) 17:54, 1 November, 2006
I think he did have some kind of surgery to lose the weight.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.175.144 (talk • contribs) 06:10, 20 December, 2006

He took "ninja" lessons?

C'mon people, it is possible to lose weight without having surgery.

Gastic bypass is a pretty extreme surgery. Do any of you have a source for that? It's something I associate more with morbidly obese people than child actors, and it also says that he lost weight by going on diets. I don't think people call getting a gastric bypass "going on a diet". Nnythm (talk) 03:33, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drake & Josh in New York?

Is that actually going to happen? Or is it just vandalism?--Socks 01 02:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is in pre-production--70.162.46.19 00:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IF HE LOST WEIGHT BY SURGERY IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IMMIDEATE NOT AN OVER TIME LOSS!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.156.65 (talk) 01:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC) Yeah i think that it actually is happening.. i mean i heard about Really Big Shrimp that way.[reply]

A bar?

This was added to the article" "On Peck's 21st birthday, he will open a bar in Los Angeles." This must be fake.--70.162.46.19 00:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did he DIE!!!!!!!!!

Is Josh Peck Dead!!!!!!

  • Sigh* This is either vandalisim or another rumor. No, Josh Peck is alive. stop saying he's dead, cause you're scaring the fans and he's too hot to die![User:ebpmgurl!fuck!][User:SonicX000000|SonicX000000]] 17:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

He is the re-incarnation of Paul McCartney, LOL. Das Baz, aka Erudil 17:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's New, Scooby-Doo?

The article does not mention Josh's guest appearance in the What's New, Scooby-Doo? episode, "E-Scream" where he plays Damian, Kid & Zombie Kid #2. This episode is written by George Doty IV, an occasional writer of Drake & Josh episodes. Drake & Josh co-star Miranda Cosgrove plays Miranda on the episode "A Terrifying Round with a Menacing Metallic Clown." Jedichowder 16:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Yeah and he also did the voices of some kids in Samuri Jack in 2002 or something. PLEEZ UPDATE!!!JA77 22 December 2007 15:26 Posted By JAYK77[reply]

Um...

Can someone explain this? I don't think he's dead...IS HE?!--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 20:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh, that's a completely different guy. Can't you tell? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.59.26 (talk) 05:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm...no...that's the same dude. And I wanted an answer from someone who knew. OK? OK. No hard feelings, :)--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 20:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, my bad! Different guy. Sorry. :D--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 20:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Appearance on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J07czbjuiNo

When I first saw this, I knew it couldn't really be the real Josh Peck, but so many people seem to think it's really him. I know the internet is full of gullible people, but people just seem to be convinced that it's really him. Can we get any confirmation on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PhantomBPR (talk • contribs) 20:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why wouldn't it be him? Dax went to New York, where I'm guessing that Josh Peck was at the time, and interviewed him. It sure looks like Josh Peck. --kaoskastle (Talk) 20:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's really Josh Peck. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.80.80.118 (talk) 05:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Table

The table on this page has the whole 2009 year listed under the 2008 listing. I looked at the coding for the table but I can't figure out what's causing it, nor how to fix it. Any takers? --kaoskastle (Talk) 20:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fake Myspace Page

The link you have as Josh's Myspace page is a fake and should be removed. He does NOT have a Myspace Page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.102.72.23 (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

picture

what about the picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yiftach T (talk • contribs) 11:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He used to be fat. Fatty gonna die —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.237.71 (talk) 22:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's not fat anymore, now that he's been abusing cocaine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.77.22.177 (talk) 01:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There should be two photographs - a before (fat and cute) and an after (slim and handsome). Das Baz, aka Erudil 16:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Dawn

This movie was released in 1984. Peck was born in 1986. I'm removing any mention to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.157.216.103 (talk) 18:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the 2010 remake, not the first one. Das Baz, aka Erudil 17:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Star Trek sequel?

It says in the filmography that it has been announced but there is no reference and I can find no other record of this. Can some verify this? And if not, can someone have it removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.77.21.51 (talk) 14:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

send to josh peck

tonto to josh peck —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.53.59.195 (talk) 18:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The page

Who put aka fatboy on the main page? Is this a form of a vandalism or is some just trolling the site? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.249.172 (talk) 03:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josh Peck Merry Christmas.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Josh Peck Merry Christmas.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drake-bell-l-and-josh-peck-arrive-at-the-world-premiere-of-merry-christmas-drake-josh.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Drake-bell-l-and-josh-peck-arrive-at-the-world-premiere-of-merry-christmas-drake-josh.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

This page needs to be protected. Too much vandalism. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 03:11, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested it at WP:RFPP. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:50, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, SNUGGUMS! I don't know how to do that, and having to constantly having to revert the vandalism was annoying. Joseph Prasad (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Josh Peck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Josh Peck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 August 2017

I've recently just noticed that in his occupations section, The "A" in "Actor" of his first occupation has been changed into a lower case instead of an uppercase letter. It needs to be fixed into an uppercase letter, because it's suppose to mark the first occupation on his list, just like the beginning of a sentence. Hope that makes sense to what I'm talking about to you guys. 174.192.7.198 (talk) 20:12, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done for now. Though I think the user that made this change, Jonathon3378, had a reason for making it lowercase. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 20:17, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! and for the info too. I wasn't trying to make a big deal out of it. 174.192.7.198 (talk) 20:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2017

change david dobrik to his best friend David Dobrik Zacolombian (talk) 02:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done David Dobrik's name is already capitalized in the article. SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 02:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2017

Most of his occupations are in cap leaders and should all be lower case, except for "Actor" and "Youtube personality". Also, what is "Viner" I don't think there's no such occupation called a "Viner", that's the only thing that should be removed from his occupation section. Because I looked it up and there's no such occupation called a "Viner". 174.192.23.120 (talk) 12:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Stickee (talk) 01:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Josh_Peck&oldid=804771633"